The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A model of the iron cycle in the ocean
Abstract
The IRONEX II in situ fertilization experiment showed decisively that availability of iron limits the growth of phytoplankton in equatorial Pacific surface waters. High‐nutrient low‐chlorophyll (HNLC) surface waters, potentially iron limited, are also found in the North Pacific and the Southern Ocean. A model of seawater iron geochemistry has been incorporated into a global ocean circulation and carbon cycle model and tuned to match the observed ocean Fe distribution. The model reproduces the observed HNLC areas in the equatorial Pacific and Southern Ocean but predicts nutrient depletion in the North Pacific (a region of high dust fluxes from Asia). The model is based on the idea that the concentrations of organic iron‐binding ligands in seawater control the subsurface Fe concentration and predicts that a majority (70–80%) of the global carbon export production can be sustained by upwelling of dissolved iron in seawater rather than by atmospheric deposition. The ocean iron cycle increases the efficiency of iron utilization in the biological pump, buffers new production against interannual fluctuations in iron deposition, and contributes several new intrinsic timescales to the ocean carbon cycle: several hundred years for the ocean iron concentration and perhaps several thousand for the concentration of ligand in the deep sea. Ocean recycling of Fe appears to play a major role in determining the strength of the biological pump in the ocean and the p CO 2 of the atmosphere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coale, K. H., Johnson, K. S., Fitzwater, S. E., Gordon, R. M., Tanner, S., Chavez, F. P., Ferioli, L., Sakamoto, C., Rogers, P., Millero, F., et al. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/383495a0 · Cited by 1,479
Self-citation
Cited by
Atmospheric global dust cycle and iron inputs to the ocean
Mahowald, N. M., Baker, A. R., Bergametti, G., Brooks, N., Duce, R. A., Jickells, T. D., Kubilay, N., Prospero, J. M., & Tegen, I. (2005) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2004gb002402 · Cited by 1,236
The biogeochemical cycle of iron in the ocean
Boyd, P. W., & Ellwood, M. J. (2010) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo964 · Cited by 992
Upper ocean ecosystem dynamics and iron cycling in a global three-dimensional model
Moore, J. K., Doney, S. C., & Lindsay, K. (2004) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2004gb002220 · Cited by 946
Ecosystem dynamics based on plankton functional types for global ocean biogeochemistry models
Quéré, C. L., Harrison, S. P., Colin Prentice, I., Buitenhuis, E. T., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Claustre, H., Cotrim Da Cunha, L., Geider, R., Giraud, X., et al. (2005) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.1004.x · Cited by 849
The organic complexation of iron in the marine environment: a review
Gledhill, M. (2012) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00069 · Cited by 631
Metadata
- Authors
- Archer, D. E., & Johnson, K.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 269-279
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W1978731813
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A model of the iron cycle in the ocean. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999gb900053
- The paper
- Archer, D. E., & Johnson, K. (2000). A model of the iron cycle in the ocean. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999gb900053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.