The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic replacement and loss of soil carbon on eroding cropland
Abstract
Links between erosion/sedimentation history and soil carbon cycling were examined in a highly erosive setting in Mississippi loess soils. We sampled soils on (relatively) undisturbed and cropped hillslopes and measured C, N, 14 C, and CO 2 flux to characterize carbon storage and dynamics and to parameterize Century and spreadsheet 14 C models for different erosion and tillage histories. For this site, where 100 years of intensive cotton cropping were followed by fertilization and contour plowing, there was an initial and dramatic decline in soil carbon content from 1870 to 1950, followed by a dramatic increase in soil carbon. Soil erosion amplifies C loss and recovery: About 100% of the original, prehistoric soil carbon was likely lost over 127 years of intensive land use, but about 30% of that carbon was replaced after 1950. The eroded cropland was therefore a local sink for CO 2 since the 1950s. However, a net CO 2 sink requires a full accounting of eroded carbon, which in turn requires that decomposition rates in lower slopes or wetlands be reduced to about 20% of the upland value. As a result, erosion may induce unaccounted sinks or sources of CO 2, depending on the fate of eroded carbon and its protection from decomposition. For erosion rates typical of the United States, the sink terms may be large enough (1 Gt yr−1, back‐of‐the‐envelope) to warrant a careful accounting of site management, cropping, and fertilization histories, as well as burial rates, for a more meaningful global assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Changes in soil carbon inventories following cultivation of previously untilled soils
Davidson, E. A., & Ackerman, I. L. (1993) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/bf00000786 · Cited by 927
Texture, Climate, and Cultivation Effects on Soil Organic Matter Content in U.S. Grassland Soils
Burke, I. C., Yonker, C. M., Parton, W. J., Cole, C. V., Flach, K., & Schimel, D. S. (1989) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1989.03615995005300030029x · Cited by 876
Self-citationRadiocarbon Dating of Soil Organic Matter
Wang, Y., Amundson, R., & Trumbore, S. (1996) · Quaternary Research · doi:10.1006/qres.1996.0029 · Cited by 277
Cited by
Lal, R., Negassa, W., & Lorenz, K. (2015) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.09.002 · Cited by 580
Nadeu, E., Gobin, A., Fiener, P., van Wesemael, B., & van Oost, K. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12889 · Cited by 99
Stability of organic matter in soils of the Belgian Loess Belt upon erosion and deposition
Wang, X., Cammeraat, L. H., Wang, Z., Zhou, J., Govers, G., & Kalbitz, K. (2013) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/ejss.12018 · Cited by 64
Kwon, H.-Y., & Hudson, R. J. M. (2010) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.025 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Harden, J. W., Sharpe, J. M., Parton, W. J., Ojima, D. S., Fries, T. L., Huntington, T. G., & Dabney, S. M.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 885-901
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W2131776087
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic replacement and loss of soil carbon on eroding cropland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999gb900061
- The paper
- Harden, J. W., Sharpe, J. M., Parton, W. J., Ojima, D. S., Fries, T. L., Huntington, T. G., & Dabney, S. M. (1999). Dynamic replacement and loss of soil carbon on eroding cropland. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999gb900061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.