Cited by 927Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportSoil Management and Crop Yield

Changes in soil carbon inventories following cultivation of previously untilled soils

Davidson, Eric A., Ackerman, Ilse L.·1993·Biogeochemistry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00000786

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conversion of native ecosystems to crops causes substantial losses of SOC averaging about 30%, most rapid immediately following land conversion, probably stabilizing within the first several decades of cultivation.

    “Conversion of native ecosystems to crops causes substantial losses of SOC (averaging about 30%), which is most rapid immediately following land conversion (Davidson & Ackerman, 1993;Guo & Gifford, 2002;Murty et al., 2002;West et al., 2004;Zinn et al., 2005;De Deyn et al., 2008;David et al., in press), probably stabilizing within the first several decades of cultivation (David et al., in press).”

    From Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops (2009) · cites this paper as Davidson & Ackerman, 1993

  • These losses should be attributed more to the disturbance of native or restored ecosystems, which consistently reduces SOC, than to the cultivation of any specific crop.

    “These losses should be attributed more to the disturbance of native or restored ecosystems, which consistently reduces SOC (Davidson & Ackerman, 1993;Guo & Gifford, 2002;Murty et al., 2002;West et al., 2004;Zinn et al., 2005), than to the cultivation of any specific crop.”

    From Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops (2009) · cites this paper as Davidson & Ackerman, 1993

  • Soil C loss following land conversion to cropland is typically 0.5 to >2 Mg C ha-1 yr-1.

    “soil C loss (typically 0.5 to >2 Mg C ha -1 yr -1 ) following land conversion to cropland has been extensively documented 13,14”

    From Climate-smart soils (2016) · cites this paper as [14]

  • Native ecosystems usually support significantly higher soil C stocks than their agricultural counterparts.

    “accordingly, native ecosystems usually support significantly higher soil C stocks than their agricultural counterparts”

    From Climate-smart soils (2016) · cites this paper as [14]

  • Total soil C losses once the soil approaches a new equilibrium are typically ~30-50% of topsoil (0-30 cm) C stocks.

    “Total losses once the soil approaches a new equilibrium are typically ~30-50% of topsoil (e.g.0-30 cm) C stocks 14”

    From Climate-smart soils (2016) · cites this paper as [14]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davidson, E. A., & Ackerman, I. L.
Affiliations
Woodwell Climate Research Center (US)
Venue
Biogeochemistry
Published
1993-09
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
161-193
ISSN
  • 0168-2563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-515X
OpenAlex
W1984760051
Cited by
927
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 51
FWCI
19.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biogeochemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
soil carbon loss, cultivation, soil carbon stocks, CO2 emissions, solum, genetic horizons, soil fertility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review