Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stability of elemental carbon in a savanna soil

Open access
Bird, M. I., Moyo, C., Veenendaal, E. M., Lloyd, J., Frost, P.·1999·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

We have investigated the stability of oxidation‐resistant elemental carbon (OREC) in a sandy savanna soil at the Matopos fire trial site, Zimbabwe. The protection of some soil plots from fire for the last 50 years at this site has enabled a comparison of OREC abundances between those plots which have been protected from fire and plots which have continued to be burnt. The total 0–5 cm OREC inventory of the soil protected from fire is estimated to be 2.0±0.5 mg cm−2; approximately half the “natural” OREC inventory at the study site of 3.8±0.5 mg cm−2 (the mean for plots burnt every 1–5 years). The associated half‐life for natural OREC loss from the 0–5 cm interval of the protected plots is calculated to be <100 years, with the half‐life for large carbonized particles (>2000 μm) in the soil being considerably <50 years. These results suggest that at least in well‐aerated tropical soil environments, charcoal and OREC can be can be significantly degraded on decadal to centennial timescales. OREC abundance and carbon‐isotope data suggest that OREC in coarse particles is progressively degraded into finer particle sizes, with a concomitant increase in resistance to oxidative degradation of OREC in the finer particle sizes due to the progressive loss of more readily degraded OREC. It remains unclear whether the OREC that is degraded is oxidized completely to CO 2 and subsequently emitted from the soil, reduced to a sufficiently small particle size to be illuviated to deeper parts of the soil profile, solubilized and lost from the profile as dissolved organic carbon or transmuted into a chemical form which is susceptible to attack by the acid‐dichromate reagent. The conclusion that a significant proportion of OREC can undergo natural degradation in well‐aerated environments on decadal/centennial timescales suggests that only a fraction of the total production of OREC from biomass burning and fossil fuel combustion is likely to be sequestered in the slow‐cycling “geological” carbon reservoir.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/1999gb900067

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Bird, M. I., Moyo, C., Veenendaal, E. M., Lloyd, J., & Frost, P.
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
1999-12
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
923-932
ISSN
  • 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9224
OpenAlex
W1994639090
Cited by
287
References
4
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stability of elemental carbon in a savanna soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999gb900067
The paper
Bird, M. I., Moyo, C., Veenendaal, E. M., Lloyd, J., & Frost, P. (1999). Stability of elemental carbon in a savanna soil. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999gb900067

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.