Cited by 1,160Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesFire effects on ecosystems

Review of the stability of biochar in soils: predictability of O:C molar ratios

Open access
Spokas, Kurt A·2010·Carbon Management

Abstract

Biochar is not a structured homogeneous material; rather it possesses a range of chemical structures and a heterogeneous elemental composition. This variability is based on the conditions of pyrolysis and the biomass parent material, with biochar spanning the range of various forms of black carbon. Thereby, this variability induces a broad spectrum in the observed rates of reactivity and, correspondingly, the overall chemical and microbial stability. From evaluating the current biochar and black carbon degradation studies, there is the suggestion of an overall relationship in biochar stability as a function of the molar ratio of oxygen to carbon (O:C) in the resulting black carbon. In general, a molar ratio of O:C lower than 0.2 appears to provide, at minimum, a 1000-year biochar half-life. The O:C ratio is a function of production temperature, but also accounts for other impacts (e.g., parent material and post-production conditioning/oxidation) that are not captured solely with production temperature. Therefore, the O:C ratio could provide a more robust indicator of biochar stability than production parameters (e.g., pyrolysis temperature and biomass type) or volatile matter determinations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4155/cmt.10.32

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Converting waste biomass into biochar, bio-oil, and syn-gas intrinsically stores 2.20 × 10^9 t CO2e annually.

    “Firstly, converting waste biomass into biochar, bio-oil, and syn-gas intrinsically stores 2.20 × ­ 10 9 t ­ CO2e annually, because it turns labile carbon that will be rapidly mineralized into recalcitrant carbon whose half life exceeds 1000 years (Ippolito et  al. 2020; Lehmann et  al. 2021; Spokas 2010).”

    From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Spokas 2010

    The Abstract says pyrolysis produces bio-oil, a solid residue and gas, and that carbon sequestered as biochar can remain in a slower-cycling form for hundreds to thousands of years. It does not give the claimed 2.20 × 10^9 t CO2e annual figure or say that bio-oil and gas intrinsically store carbon. The Microbial degradation of biochar section reports widely varying estimated half-lives, so a half-life exceeding 1,000 years is not established for biochar generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Miscanthus biochar had H/C (0.21) and O/C (0.03) molar ratios typical for grass feedstocks pyrolyzed at 500 to 700°C.

    “The Miscanthus biochar had H/C (0.21) and O/C (0.03) molar ratios that are typical for grass feedstocks pyrolyzed at 500 to 700°C (Spokas, 2010).”

    From Remediation of an acidic mine spoil: Miscanthus biochar and lime amendment affects metal availability, plant growth, and soil enzyme activity (2018) · cites this paper as Spokas, 2010

    The Oxygen to carbon molar ratio section says O:C varies with production temperature, but its correlation is weak; it does not establish ratios typical of grass biochars made at 500–700°C. Searches for Miscanthus, grass feedstocks, H/C 0.21, and O/C 0.03 found no passage verifying the specific comparison. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Complete graphitization requires a temperature greater than 1100°C during biochar preparation.

    “To have a complete graphitization, a temperature greater than 1100°C should be reached during the biochar preparation (Spokas 2010).”

    From Mechanisms and adsorption capacities of biochar for the removal of organic and inorganic pollutants from industrial wastewater (2021) · cites this paper as Spokas 2010

    The Chemical composition variability section discusses graphitization but gives no 1100°C threshold; it says graphitization at the temperatures and pressures under discussion would require more than 10,000 years. A search for 1100°C and graphitization found no passage stating the claimed temperature requirement for biochar preparation. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The electron donor and acceptor interaction mechanism is mostly applied to adsorption of aromatic compounds on biochar with a graphene-like structure.

    “The electron donor and acceptor interaction mechanism is mostly applied to the adsorption of aromatic compounds on biochar presenting a graphene-like structure.”

    From Mechanisms and adsorption capacities of biochar for the removal of organic and inorganic pollutants from industrial wastewater (2021) · cites this paper as Spokas 2010

    Chemical composition variability (page unavailable) describes graphitic sheets in biochar, and Box 1 (page unavailable) reports aromatic compounds sorbed on biochar. Neither passage addresses electron donor–acceptor interactions or says that this mechanism is mostly applied to adsorption on graphene-like biochar. Searches for the mechanism and its proposed application found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. n Review article on the surface chemistries of black carbon (biochar).
  2. n Review of biochar, covering many of the other factors and considerations for biochar use and benefit.
  3. Ozcimen D, Karaosmanoglu F. Production and characterization of bio-oil and biochar from rapeseed cake. Renew. Energ. 29(5), 779-787 (2004).
  4. Review Spokas
  5. Steinbeiss S, Gleixner G, Antonietti M. Effect of biochar amendment on soil carbon balance and soil microbial activity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41(6), 1301-1310 (2009). 121

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spokas, K. A.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Spokas, Kurt A
Venue
Carbon Management
Published
2010-12
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
289-303
ISSN
  • 1758-3004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-3012
OpenAlex
W2102398472
Cited by
1,160
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 107 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 24
FWCI
35.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Carbon Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
Keywords
biochar stability, soil carbon, black carbon, pyrolysis temperature, microbial degradation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review