Cited by 27Atmospheric aerosols and cloudsMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ice cloud inhomogeneity: Quantifying bias in emissivity from radar observations

Pomroy, Hannah R., Illingworth, Anthony J.·2000·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

In numerical models the infra‐red emissivity of ice clouds is generally computed from the optical depth. The convex relationship between these two quantities implies that if ice clouds are inhomogeneous, emissivities calculated from a grid‐box mean optical depth will be biased high. An analogous effect in stratocumulus albedo and liquid water path is compensated for by multiplying liquid water by 0.7 to calculate albedo. However it is unclear that a similar correction is valid for all cloud types. In this paper profiles of radar reflectivity in mid‐latitude winter ice clouds are analysed to derive the variability of optical depth and quantify any biases introduced into emissivities calculated from grid‐box mean optical depths. The bias is small for grid‐lengths of 10km, but the average optical depth should be multiplied by a correction factor of 0.44 for calculating emissivities in a 300km box.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/1999gl011149

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<2289:APFCGA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  2. 10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<2304:APFCGA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  3. 10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<2434:TAOFSC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/qj.49712051804 · DOI
  5. Hogan R. J., 1999, The potential of spaceborne dual‐wavelength radar to make global measurements of cirrus clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 3518
  6. 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<0919:PPABFS>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  7. 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<0933:PPABFS>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  8. Paltridge G. W., 1976, Radiative Processes in Meteorology and Climatology
  9. 10.1029/1998JD200125 · DOI
  10. 10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<0745:AEOCRP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 27

Metadata

Authors
Pomroy, H. R., & Illingworth, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Reading (GB)
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2000-07-15
Volume
27
Issue
14
Pages
2101-2104
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W1963567265
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
infrared emissivity, optical depth, radar reflectivity, cloud radiative transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ice cloud inhomogeneity: Quantifying bias in emissivity from radar observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999gl011149
The paper
Pomroy, H. R., & Illingworth, A. J. (2000). Ice cloud inhomogeneity: Quantifying bias in emissivity from radar observations. Geophysical Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999gl011149