Cited by 343Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFire effects on ecosystemsAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies

Biomass burning as a source of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, methanol, acetone, acetonitrile, and hydrogen cyanide

Holzinger, Rupert, Warneke, Carsten, Hansel, Armin, Jordan, Alfons, Lindinger, Werner, Scharffe, Dieter H., Schade, Gunnar, Crutzen, Paul J.·1999·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Using a novel experimental technique, based on proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry, from measurements of emissions from laboratory scale biomass burning experiments, we have estimated the source strengths of several potential HO x producing gases: formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, methanol and acetone. The derived global average emissions are 5–13; 3.8–10; 1.5‐4; 2.3‐6.1 Tg y−1, respectively. The resulting global average HO x production from photochemical decay of these gases is 3 × 10 9 molecules cm−2 s−1. Although relatively small in a global context, these emissions are significant for the photochemistry in fresh fire plumes. From our measurements are also estimated global source strengths from biomass burning for CH 3 CN and HCN of 0.4‐1.0; 0.2‐0.6 Tg y−1 respectively. The biomass burning emissions of CH 3 CN may well dominate the global source of this compound, which thus might well be a unique tracer for biomass burning. Some discrepancies between experimental studies must, however, be resolved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/1999gl900156

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Factor 1 is rich in C2-C6 hydrocarbons, alkenes and acetonitrile, with contributions mainly during the first leg when the air masses originate from the Suez Canal.

    “Factor 1 illustrates an emission source that is rich in C2–C6 hydrocarbons, alkenes and acetonitrile (a biomass-burning tracer23), with contributions mainly during the first leg when the air masses originate from the Suez Canal (Supplementary Fig. 7).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holzinger, R., Warneke, C., Hansel, A., Jordan, A., Lindinger, W., Scharffe, D. H., Schade, G., & Crutzen, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
  • Max Planck Institute for Chemistry (DE)
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
1999-04-15
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
1161-1164
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2119705547
Cited by
343
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
12.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Keywords
biomass burning emissions, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, methanol, acetone, acetonitrile, hydrogen cyanide, fire plume, proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry, volatile organic compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review