The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Composition of quasi‐stationary solar wind flows from Ulysses/Solar Wind Ion Composition Spectrometer
Open accessAbstract
Using improved, self‐consistent analysis techniques, we determine the average solar wind charge state and elemental composition of nearly 40 ion species of He, C, N, O, Ne, Mg, Si, S, and Fe observed with the Solar Wind Ion Composition Spectrometer on Ulysses. We compare results obtained during selected time periods, including both slow solar wind and fast streams, concentrating on the quasi‐stationary flows away from recurrent or intermittent disturbances such as corotating interaction regions or coronal mass ejections. In the fast streams the charge state distributions are consistent with a single freezing‐in temperature for each element, whereas in the slow wind these distributions appear to be composed of contributions from a range of temperatures. The elemental composition shows the well‐known first ionization potential (FIP) bias of the solar wind composition with respect to the photosphere. However, it appears that our average enrichment factor of low‐FIP elements in the slow wind, not quite a factor of 3, is smaller than that in previous compilations. In fast streams the FIP bias is found to be yet smaller but still significantly above 1, clearly indicating that the FIP fractionation effect is also active beneath coronal holes from where the fast wind originates. This imposes basic requirements upon FIP fractionation models, which should reproduce the stronger and more variable low‐FIP bias in the slow wind and a weaker (and perhaps conceptually different) low‐FIP bias in fast streams. Taken together, these results firmly establish the fundamental difference between the two quasi‐stationary solar wind types.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Abundances of the elements: Meteoritic and solar
Anders, E., & Grevesse, N. (1989) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-x · Cited by 10,422
THE STOPPING AND RANGE OF IONS IN SOLIDS
Ziegler, J. F. (1988) · Ion Implantation Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-780621-1.50005-8 · Cited by 9,047
The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter
Ziegler, J. F., & Biersack, J. P. (1985) · Treatise on Heavy-Ion Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-8103-1_3 · Cited by 3,984
Coronal Expansion and Solar Wind
Hundhausen, A. J. (1972) · Physics and chemistry in space · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-65414-5 · Cited by 1,042
A coronal hole and its identification as the source of a high velocity solar wind stream
Krieger, A. S., Timothy, A. F., & Roelof, E. C. (1973) · Solar Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00150828 · Cited by 799
Large-Scale Structure of the Interplanetary Medium
Schwenn, R. (1990) · Physics of the Inner Heliosphere I · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75361-9_3 · Cited by 390
Cosmic Winds and the Heliosphere
(2018) · University of Arizona Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1zxsmpd · Cited by 341
Origin of the solar wind from composition data
Geiss, J., Gloeckler, G., & Steiger, R. V. (1995) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/bf00768753 · Cited by 326
Self-citationSome physical processes in the solar wind
Hollweg, J. V. (1978) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/rg016i004p00689 · Cited by 268
The solar wind ion composition spectrometer
Gloeckler, G., Geiss, J., Balsiger, H., Bedini, P. D., Cain, J., Fisher, J. R., Fisk, L. A., Galvin, A. B., Gliem, F., Hamilton, D. C., et al. (1992) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 233
Self-citation
Cited by
Large gradual solar energetic particle events
Desai, M., & Giacalone, J. (2016) · Living Reviews in Solar Physics · doi:10.1007/s41116-016-0002-5 · Cited by 531
Solar wind stream interaction regions throughout the heliosphere
Richardson, I. G. (2018) · Living Reviews in Solar Physics · doi:10.1007/s41116-017-0011-z · Cited by 367
Energetic Particles and Corotating Interaction Regions in the Solar Wind
Richardson, I. G. (2004) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1023/b:spac.0000032689.52830.3e · Cited by 263
Approximating the X‐ray spectrum emitted from astrophysical charge exchange
Smith, R. K., Foster, A. R., & Brickhouse, N. S. (2012) · Astronomische Nachrichten · doi:10.1002/asna.201211673 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- von Steiger, R., Schwadron, N. A., Fisk, L. A., Geiss, J., Gloeckler, G., Hefti, S., Wilken, B., Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. R., & Zurbuchen, T. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- A12
- Pages
- 27217-27238
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075147663
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 13.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Composition of quasi‐stationary solar wind flows from Ulysses/Solar Wind Ion Composition Spectrometer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999ja000358
- The paper
- von Steiger, R., Schwadron, N. A., Fisk, L. A., Geiss, J., Gloeckler, G., Hefti, S., Wilken, B., Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. R., & Zurbuchen, T. H. (2000). Composition of quasi‐stationary solar wind flows from Ulysses/Solar Wind Ion Composition Spectrometer. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999ja000358
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.