Cited by 112Marine and coastal ecosystemsOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesClimate variability and models

Biological and physical signatures in the tropical and subtropical Atlantic

Open access
Signorini, S. R., Murtugudde, R. G., McClain, C. R., Christian, J. R., Picaut, J., Busalacchi, A. J.·1999·Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Abstract

The variability of sea surface chlorophyll concentration in the tropical and subtropical Atlantic during the first year of Sea‐viewing Wide Field‐of‐view Sensor (SeaWiFS) imagery is examined. An Ocean General Circulation Model (OGCM) is used, along with TOPEX/Poseidon dynamic height observations and global gridded wind stress data sets, to explain the physical forcing of surface ocean color signals. Regions of high surface chlorophyll are strongly correlated with mesoscale and large‐scale physical processes such as the strong upwelling off the west coast of Africa, the relatively high oceanic production within the Guinea Dome region, and the generation and propagation of large anticyclonic eddies along the coast of South America, north of the equator. The major river outflows (Amazon, Orinoco, and Congo) have strong signatures with plumes of apparently high Chl a in excess of 10 mg m−3 near their deltas. The fall bloom in the eastern tropical Atlantic observed by the Coastal Zone Color Scanner (CZCS) was absent in 1997, whereas a bloom was observed in this region in July‐September 1998, which was not observed by the CZCS. We attribute these apparent anomalies to the projection of the 1997–1998 El Niño event into the tropical Atlantic basin; these signals are correlated with sea surface temperature anomalies known to be associated with ENSO. The SeaWiFS images show that there are seasonal blooms within the hydrographic provinces of the Guinea and Angola domes. These hydrograph…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/1999jc900134

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Signorini, S. R., Murtugudde, R. G., McClain, C. R., Christian, J. R., Picaut, J., & Busalacchi, A. J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Published
1999-08-15
Volume
104
Issue
C8
Pages
18367-18382
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113105607
Cited by
112
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
sea surface chlorophyll, tropical Atlantic, subtropical Atlantic, SeaWiFS, ocean color, upwelling, anticyclonic eddies, Amazon River plume, fall bloom, El Niño, ENSO, thermocline dynamics, Ekman pumping, Ekman drift, North Equatorial Current, Benguela Current, river plume, seasonal phytoplankton blooms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review