Cited by 33Marine and coastal ecosystemsOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Physical drivers of the nitrate seasonal variability in the Atlantic cold tongue

Open access
Radenac, Marie-Hélène, Jouanno, Julien, Tchamabi, Christine Carine, Awo, Mesmin, Bourlès, Bernard, Arnault, Sabine, Aumont, Olivier·2020·Biogeosciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Ocean color observations show semiannual variations in chlorophyll in the Atlantic cold tongue with a main bloom in boreal summer and a secondary bloom in December. In this study, ocean color and in situ measurements and a coupled physical–biogeochemical model are used to investigate the processes that drive this variability. Results show that the main phytoplankton bloom in July–August is driven by a strong vertical supply of nitrate in May–July, and the secondary bloom in December is driven by a shorter and moderate supply in November. The upper ocean nitrate balance is analyzed and shows that vertical advection controls the nitrate input in the equatorial euphotic layer and that vertical diffusion and meridional advection are key in extending and shaping the bloom off Equator. Below the mixed layer, observations and modeling show that the Equatorial Undercurrent brings low-nitrate water (relative to off-equatorial surrounding waters) but still rich enough to enhance the cold tongue productivity. Our results also give insights into the influence of intraseasonal processes in these exchanges. The submonthly meridional advection significantly contributes to the nitrate decrease below the mixed layer.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Ocean color, in situ measurements, and a coupled physical-biogeochemical model show that the Atlantic cold tongue has a semiannual chlorophyll cycle with a main bloom in July–August and a secondary bloom in December. The main bloom is driven by strong vertical nitrate supply in May–July, while the December bloom is driven by a shorter, weaker November supply.

Key findings

  • The July–August bloom is driven by strong vertical nitrate supply in May–July; the December bloom is driven by a shorter and moderate supply in November.
  • In the upper ocean nitrate balance, vertical advection controls nitrate input in the equatorial euphotic layer, while vertical diffusion and meridional advection are key in extending and shaping the bloom off equator; horizontal advection mostly brings nitrate-low water below the mixed layer.
  • The Equatorial Undercurrent brings low-nitrate water relative to off-equatorial surrounding waters, but it is still rich enough to enhance cold tongue productivity.
  • On annual average, intraseasonal advection supplies nitrate because eddy vertical advection exceeds horizontal advection, representing about 35% of the advective nitrate input in the mixed layer and about 45% in the euphotic layer.

Methods

  • In situ nitrate, chlorophyll, and ADCP measurements were collected along 10° W during PIRATA and EGEE transects: 13 transects with nitrate between 2004 and 2014 and four with chlorophyll from 2011 to 2014; PIRATA mooring data at 10° W, 0° N included monthly temperature since September 1997 and daily ADCP profiles from December 2001 to March 2017.
  • Satellite data included GlobColour monthly surface chlorophyll at 25 km resolution and TropFlux monthly SST maps from 1979 to 2016 at 1° resolution between 30° S and 30° N.
  • A regional NEMO-PISCES coupled simulation covered 35° S–35° N and 100° W–15° E at 1/4° horizontal resolution with 75 vertical levels, integrated from 1993 to 2015; monthly averages for 1995–2015 were analyzed, with nitrate budgets computed in the mixed layer and euphotic layer and advection decomposed into low-frequency and submonthly/eddy components.

Limitations

  • Stated: cruise sampling prevents study of an entire seasonal cycle, so the coupled simulation is used to complement the nitrate and chlorophyll seasonal cycles.
  • Stated: the model was initially designed to study large-scale processes and cannot totally explain the seasonal evolution of the nitrate budget; a dedicated study is needed to better separate large-scale and eddying signals and identify the intraseasonal processes at work.
  • Stated model biases include a simulated chlorophyll maximum shifted about 5° east of satellite observations, a nitrate positive bias reaching 5 µmol l⁻¹ in the nitracline in the 5° S–2° S region, a nitrate-depleted surface layer about 10 m shallower than observed, and simulated temperature and current vertical structures that are too shallow, with the 20° C isotherm and EUC core depths 12 and 16 m shallower than observed.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/bg-17-529-2020

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

31 of 79 cited sources checked · 13 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationcitation

    Strong similarities between the seasonal cycle of chlorophyll and the seasonal cycle of sea surface temperature suggest that the same physical processes could control the supply of cool and nutrient-rich waters into the euphotic layer.

    “Strong similarities between this seasonal cycle and the seasonal cycle of sea surface temperature (SST) suggest that the same physical processes could control the supply of cool and nutrient-rich waters into the euphotic layer (Hisard, 1973;Oudot and Morin, 1987;Grodsky et al., 2008;Jouanno et al., 2011a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hisard, 1973

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Oudot and Morin, 1987

      The Seasonal Variability section reports summer surface cooling accompanied by nutrient enrichment at 4°W. But Equatorial Nutrient Enrichment and Phytoplankton Biomass reports nearly identical chlorophyll quantities in the upwelling band in summer and winter; the Conclusion likewise says phytoplankton biomass is no higher in summer. Thus the paper supports the supply of cool, nutrient-rich water, but contradicts the claimed strong seasonal similarity between chlorophyll and sea-surface temperature there. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Grodsky et al., 2008 source
  • Premisecitation

    Nitrate is more elevated in the EUC in August than during spring.

    “Likewise, nitrate is more elevated in the EUC in August than during spring (Oudot and Morin, 1987), as expected from the strong relationship between nitrate and temperature in the nitracline of the cold tongue all year long (Voituriez and Herbland, 1984).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Oudot and Morin, 1987
  • Findingcitation

    Central equatorial mixed layer nitrate variability does not seem to be directly connected with mixed layer nitrate input along the African coast.

    “This central equatorial variability does not seem to be directly connected with mixed layer nitrate input along the African coast, in agreement with the chlorophyll behavior in the equatorial Atlantic deduced from satellite data (Grodsky et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Grodsky et al., 2008 source
  • Premisecitation

    There is a strong relationship between nitrate and temperature in the nitracline of the cold tongue all year long.

    “as expected from the strong relationship between nitrate and temperature in the nitracline of the cold tongue all year long (Voituriez and Herbland, 1984).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Voituriez and Herbland, 1984
  • Findingcitation

    In the 20 m surface layer, the model well captures the weakening of the SEC in January-February and September-October.

    “In the 20 m surface layer, the model well captures the weakening of the SEC in January-February and September-October (Okumura and Xie, 2006;Ding et al., 2009;Habasque and Herbert, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Okumura and Xie, 2006 source

      The Seasonal cycle section describes a substantial semiannual cycle in ocean currents and a second SEC acceleration in November–December, supporting the general point that SEC strength varies seasonally. It does not specify weakening in January–February and September–October. The Data section says the paper analyzes observed surface-current climatology, not whether the citing authors’ model captures currents in a 20 m layer; that model assessment is the citing authors’ own claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Ding et al., 2009 source

      The Dynamics of the Seasonal Cycle (§4, paragraph 21) says both models simulate the equatorial surface-current cycle well, and the Observed Seasonal Cycle (§3, paragraph 18) describes an eastward anomaly in September–October, consistent with a weakening of the westward SEC. But the paper does not identify a 20 m surface layer or establish a basin-wide SEC weakening in January–February; it describes the beginning-of-year anomaly as eastward in the east but weak and westward in the west. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Habasque and Herbert, 2018 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 24
  • May combine two claims. 60
  • Not yet classified. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mixed Rossby-gravity waves, inertia-gravity waves, and Kelvin waves are believed to contribute to cooling the Atlantic cold tongue through both northward advection of cold tongue water and vertical mixing, although no calculations of the heat budget were done.

    “Mixed Rossby-gravity waves, inertia-gravity waves, and Kelvin waves are believed to contribute to cooling the Atlantic cold tongue through both northward advection of cold tongue water and vertical mixing (Houghton and Colin, 1987;Marin et al., 2009;Jouanno et al., 2013), although no calculations of the heat budget were done.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Houghton and Colin, 1987 source
    • cites Marin et al., 2009 source
    • cites Jouanno et al., 2013 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Tropical instability waves dominate the intraseasonal variability in the western and central equatorial Atlantic, while wind-forced waves dominate in the east.

    “no such study is available in the equatorial Atlantic where TIW dominate the intraseasonal variability in the western and central basins and wind forced waves dominate in the east (Athié and Marin, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Athié and Marin, 2008 source

      Section 3.3 identifies TIW-period variability in the central basin, and the Summary and Conclusion (§6) describes an eastern equatorial 15-day SST signal locally forced by wind stress. But §3.3 attributes the dominant variability west of 30°W to North Equatorial Countercurrent meanders rather than TIWs, so the claim overextends TIW dominance to the western basin. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    A semiannual cycle of surface chlorophyll exists in the Atlantic cold tongue, with a primary bloom in July-August between 20°W and 5°W and a shorter, weaker secondary bloom in December.

    “Ocean color observations show semiannual variations of chlorophyll in the Atlantic cold tongue with a main bloom in boreal summer and a secondary bloom in December.”
    • Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
      “Nevertheless, a semiannual cycle of surface chlorophyll emerges as illustrated by the ocean color archive for the period 1998-2016 (Fig. 1a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Perez et al., 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Grodsky et al., 2008 source
    • cites Jouanno et al., 2011a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The decomposition method used to separate advection terms has been used to estimate the eddy contribution to SST budget in the Pacific mixed layer and oxygen advection in the Arabian Sea.

    “Such decomposition has been used to estimate the eddy contribution to SST budget in the Pacific mixed layer (Vialard et al., 2001) and oxygen advection in the Arabian Sea (Resplandy et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Vialard et al., 2001 source
    • cites Resplandy et al., 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The simulated nitrate concentration at ZEUC is less than 2 μmol l -1 in spring and rises to nearly 9 μmol l -1 in August, in agreement with observations at 4° W.

    “The 235 simulated nitrate concentration at ZEUC (not shown) is less than 2 µmol l -1 in spring and rises to nearly 9 µmol l -1 in August, in agreement with observations at 4° W (Oudot and Morin, 1987).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Oudot and Morin, 1987

      The “SEASONAL VARIABILITY—Surface” section reports that nitrate at 4°W increased between April and August, supporting the claimed seasonal pattern. It does not report concentrations at ZEUC or the stated values of less than 2 and nearly 9 µmol l⁻¹; its surface observations are less than 0.1 in the warm season and more than 2 in the cold season, with a maximum exceeding 6. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    East of 10° E, the impacts of wind forced equatorial waves superimpose at different frequencies: Kelvin waves at periods between 25 and 40 days, mixed Rossby-gravity waves between 15 and 20 days, and inertia-gravity waves between 5 and 11 days.

    “East of 10° E, the impacts of wind forced equatorial waves superimpose at different frequencies (Houghton and Colin, 1987;Athié et al., 2008;de Coëtlogon et al., 2010;Jouanno et al., 2013;Herbert and Bourlès, 2018): Kelvin waves at periods between 25 and 40 days, mixed Rossby-gravity waves between 15 and 20 days, and inertia-gravity waves between 5 and 11 days.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Houghton and Colin, 1987 source
    • cites Athié et al., 2008 source

      The Introduction (§1, paragraphs 2 and 8; page unavailable) describes wind-forced variability near 15 days and relates 10–20-day variability to mixed Rossby–gravity waves. The dominant-period analysis (§3.3, paragraph 30) finds overlapping 10–20-day and 25–50-day signals along the equator, but does not identify the longer-period signal as Kelvin waves. Our copy does not support the claimed 5–11-day inertia–gravity waves or locate this combination east of 10°E. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites de Coëtlogon et al., 2010 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    One reason the conclusion on the nature of intraseasonal processes affecting the nitrate budget east of 10° W is not straightforward could be that the low frequency signal captures part of the Kelvin wave induced variability as there is no sharp cutoff at 30 days in the spectrum of Kelvin waves.

    “One reason could be that the low frequency signal captures part of the Kelvin wave induced variability as there is no sharp cutoff at 30 days in the spectrum of Kelvin waves (Athié and Marin, 2008;Athié et al., 2009;Jouanno et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Athié and Marin, 2008 source

      Section 3.3 reports SST variability east of 10°W in 10–20-day and 25–50-day bands, but does not identify it as Kelvin-wave variability. Searches for Kelvin waves and a 30-day spectral cutoff found no passage addressing whether lower-frequency signals capture Kelvin-wave variability; the paper also does not address the nitrate budget. The indexed passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Athié et al., 2009 source
    • cites Jouanno et al., 2013 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    This differs from the overall warming contribution of TIW to the SST budget of the equatorial Pacific cold tongue showed by Menkes et al. (2006).

    “It differs from the overall warming contribution of TIW to the SST budget of the equatorial Pacific cold tongue showed by Menkes et al. (2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Menkes et al. (2006) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Ding et al. (2009) put forward the presence of a basin mode that explains semiannual changes of SSH gradient.

    “Ding et al. (2009) put forward the presence of a basin mode that explains semiannual changes of SSH gradient.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ding et al. (2009) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Menkes et al. (2006) found that TIW vertical advection was low and that the TIW effect was to warm the Pacific cold tongue in the upper 200 m.

    “However, Menkes et al. (2006) found that the TIW vertical advection was low and that the TIW effect was to warm the Pacific cold tongue in the upper 200 m.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Menkes et al. (2006) source

      Section 5 reports that TIW-induced vertical advection is small in the mixed layer and that TIWs warm that layer. It also reports stronger vertical-advection cooling at 30–100 m and some net cooling at 50–130 m farther north. The paper therefore does not support describing vertical advection as low, or the TIW effect as warming, throughout the upper 200 m. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Because the horizontal and vertical patterns of temperature and nitrate in a tropical instability vortex are close, advection of nitrate anomaly by eddy zonal and meridional currents could drive nitrate losses by eddy zonal and meridional advection in the same way as advection of anomalous temperature by anomalous currents drives mixed layer warming close to the equator.

    “As the horizontal and vertical patterns of temperature and nitrate in a tropical instability vortex are close (Menkes et al., 2002), the advection of nitrate anomaly by eddy zonal and meridional currents could drive nitrate losses by eddy zonal and meridional advection in the same way as the advection of anomalous temperature by anomalous currents drives a mixed layer warming close to the equator.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Menkes et al., 2002 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In the equatorial zone, the model nitrate is slightly overestimated (less than 1 μmol l -1 ) above the 5 μmol l -1 nitrate isoline and slightly underestimated (about 1 μmol l -1 ) below.

    “In the equatorial zone, the model nitrate is slightly overestimated (less than 1 µmol l -1 ) above the 5 µmol l -1 nitrate isoline (which is close to the 20° C isotherm depth) and 220 slightly underestimated (about 1 µmol l -1 ) below.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Four phases emerge from the nitrate seasonal evolution in the mixed layer of the central equatorial Atlantic: an increase between April and July, a decrease between August and October, a rapid increase in November, and a secondary decrease starting in December.

    “Four phases emerge from the nitrate seasonal evolution in the mixed layer of the central equatorial Atlantic: a nitrate 255 increase between April and July, a decrease between August and October, a rapid increase in November, and a secondary decrease starting in December (Fig. 5b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The deep chlorophyll maximum (DCM) is located in the upper nitracline and intensifies between 5° S and 2° N.

    “The deep chlorophyll maximum (DCM) is located in the upper nitracline and intensifies between 5° S and 2° N.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During the warm and low productive season, the low chlorophyll and nitrate depleted layer extends from the surface to 30 m between 1° N and 5° S and deepens southward.

    “During the warm and low productive season, the low chlorophyll (Fig. 2b) and nitrate depleted (Fig. 2a) layer extends from the surface to 30 m between 1° N and 5° S and deepens southward.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Seasonal variations of the depth of the EUC core are small while the thermocline depth shows larger vertical movements.

    “Seasonal variations of the depth of the EUC core are small while the thermocline depth shows larger 150 vertical movements.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The DCM is located near the thermocline core between 50 and 60 m in spring, raises toward the surface at the same time as the thermocline core in summer, sinks in early fall, and raises again in November.

    “It is located near the thermocline core between 50 and 60 m in spring, raises toward the surface at the same time than the thermocline core in summer, sinks in early fall, and raises again in November.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The model surface chlorophyll is slightly higher than observed east of the equatorial chlorophyll maximum.

    “The model surface chlorophyll is also slightly higher than observed east of the equatorial chlorophyll maximum.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both vertical advection and vertical diffusion contribute to nitrate inputs in the mixed layer.

    “Unlike the negligible contribution of vertical advection in the temperature budget in the mixed layer of the equatorial Atlantic (Jouanno et al., 2011b), both vertical advection (Fig. 5e) and vertical diffusion (Fig. 5f) contribute to nitrate inputs in the mixed layer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jouanno et al., 2011b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Off the equator, meridional advection acts to spread the upwelled nitrate-rich water poleward along the northern boundary of the nitrate-rich patch and, to a lesser extent, along the southern boundary where the nitrate gradient is weaker.

    “Off the equator, meridional advection acts to spread the upwelled nitrate rich water poleward along the northern boundary of the nitrate rich patch and, to a lesser extent, along the southern boundary where the nitrate gradient is weaker.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During the cold and productive season, the nitracline is uplifted and nitrate reaches the surface.

    “During the cold and productive season, the nitracline is uplifted and nitrate reaches the surface (Fig. 2c).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Results are close to the distributions during the cold and warm seasons described along 4° W in the 70s and 80s and along 10° W during the June and September 2005 EGEE cruises.

    “Results are close to the distributions during the cold and warm seasons described along 4° W in the 70s and 80s (Voituriez and Herbland, 1977;Oudot, 1983;Monger et al., 135 1997) and along 10° W during the June and September 2005 EGEE cruises (Nubi et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Voituriez and Herbland, 1977

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Oudot, 1983
    • cites Monger et al., 1997 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    The surface chlorophyll values are the largest in the 20° W-5° W, 1.5° S-0.5° N region.

    “We focus on the 20° W-5° W, 1.5° S-0.5° N region where the surface chlorophyll values are the largest.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Surface chlorophyll is at its minimum in spring and a secondary minimum occurs in October.

    “The surface chlorophyll is at its minimum in spring and a secondary minimum occurs in October.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The thermocline is about 20 m below the EUC core in April and about 30 m above in August.

    “The thermocline is about 20 m below the EUC core in April and about 30 m above in August, leading to variations in the properties of the EUC water.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The scenario leading to the December secondary nitrate maximum in the mixed layer is close to the boreal summer nitrate evolution, except that the duration of the processes is shorter (about one month long), their magnitudes are weaker, and they span a narrower longitudinal range.

    “The scenario leading to the December secondary nitrate maximum in the mixed layer is close to the boreal summer nitrate evolution, except that the duration of the processes is shorter (about one month long), their magnitudes are weaker, and they span a narrower longitudinal range (Fig. 5).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In July, nitrate supply to the mixed layer by physical processes and nitrate uptake are at their maximum.

    “In Fig. 6, we show the regional distribution of the different terms of the nitrate balance in July, when the nitrate supply to the mixed layer by physical processes and nitrate uptake are at their maximum.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Chlorophyll maximum and SST minimum are found in July-August and in December.

    “chlorophyll maximum and SST minimum are found in July-August and in December.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Advection of nitrate-poor water from the east and meridional advection counteract the vertical nitrate supply near the equator.

    “Advection of nitrate poor water from the east (Fig. 6c) and meridional advection (Fig. 6d) counteract the vertical nitrate supply near the equator.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The minimum SST and maximum surface chlorophyll coincide and are located south of the equator between 20° W and 5° W.

    “The minimum SST and maximum surface chlorophyll coincide and are located south of the equator between 20° W and 5° W.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In August-September, physical processes drive reduced nitrate supply in the upper part of the euphotic layer and nitrate removal in its deeper part.

    “At that time of the year, physical processes drive reduced nitrate supply in the upper part of the euphotic layer and nitrate removal in its deeper part (Fig. 7i).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Meridional advection is a weak source of nitrate in the mixed layer while it significantly contributes to the nitrate decrease below.

    “Meridional advection is a weak source of nitrate in the mixed layer while it significantly contributes to the nitrate decrease below (Fig. 7d).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both low-frequency and eddy advections contribute to the nitrate supply through vertical advection, especially in the upper EUC between June and December.

    “Both the low frequency (Fig. 8c) and eddy (Fig. 8f) advections contribute to the nitrate supply through vertical advection, especially in the upper EUC between June and December.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Horizontal advection drives the strong nitrate loss in August-September and the lesser one in December-January when the contributions of both zonal and meridional advections are the largest.

    “It drives the strong nitrate loss in August-September and the lesser one in December-January (Fig. 7b) when the contributions of both zonal (Fig. 7c) and meridional (Fig. 7d) advections are the largest.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The depth of the thermocline and associated nitracline varies from 60 m in spring to about 20 m in July-August while the upwelling core remains in the upper part of the EUC, at 20-30 m, all year long.

    “It conditions the depth of the thermocline and associated nitracline that varies from 60 m in spring to 360 about 20 m in July-August while the upwelling core remains in the upper part of the EUC, at 20-30 m, all year long (Fig. 4e).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Nitrate is consumed by biological activity in the euphotic layer and remineralized below.

    “In contrast, nitrate is consumed by the biological activity in the euphotic layer and remineralized below.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Physical processes mostly bring nitrate into the euphotic layer with maximum input in the mixed layer in May-August and below the mixed layer in November.

    “Physical processes mostly bring 310 nitrate into the euphotic layer with maximum input in the mixed layer in May-August and below the mixed layer in November.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The maximum vertical advection is located near the layer of maximum vertical nitrate gradient, close to the depth of the 20° C isotherm, and it occurs when the vertical velocity is strong (July and November).

    “The maximum vertical advection is located near the layer of maximum vertical nitrate gradient, close to the depth of the 20° C isotherm, and it occurs when the vertical velocity is strong 325 (July and November).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Biological losses prevail over physical supply in August-October and in December-January.

    “During the short second peak in November; biological losses prevail over physical supply in August-October and in December-January.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Vertical advection drives the main nitrate increase in May-July and the secondary one in November when easterly winds strengthen.

    “It drives the main nitrate increase in May-July and the secondary one in November when easterly winds strengthen.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In between, nitrate is removed by horizontal advection in August-September and during the secondary loss event in December-January.

    “In between, nitrate is removed by horizontal advection in August-September and during the secondary loss event in December-January.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The model reproduces the horizontal and vertical patterns of chlorophyll observed in the studied area and its semiannual cycle.

    “The model reproduces the horizontal and vertical patterns of chlorophyll observed in the studied area and its semiannual cycle.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The main nitrate supply period occurs from May to July and a secondary supply also occurs in November.

    “The main supply period occurs from May to July and a secondary supply also occurs in November.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The more elevated surface chlorophyll concentrations are found in the 20° W-5° W, 1.5° S-0.5° N zone.

    “The more elevated surface chlorophyll concentrations are found in the 20° W-5° W, 1.5° S-0.5° N zone”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The depths of the 20°C isotherm (Z20) and of the EUC core (ZEUC) are 12 and 16 m shallower.

    “The depths of the 20° C isotherm (Z20) and of the EUC core (ZEUC) are 12 and 16 m shallower”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The results show how thermocline and nitracline uplift affects the zonal nitrate gradient in the EUC and so influences nitrate removal by horizontal advection and then vertical supply.

    “Our results show how the thermocline and nitracline uplift affects the zonal nitrate gradient in the EUC and so, how it influences nitrate removal by horizontal advection and then vertical supply.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    East of 10° W, nitrate removal through eddy horizontal advection is driven by eddy zonal advection while eddy meridional advection strongly decreases.

    “East of 10° W, the nitrate removal through eddy horizontal advection is driven by eddy zonal advection while eddy meridional advection strongly decreases (not shown).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    On an annual average, nitrate is supplied by intraseasonal advection because eddy induced vertical advection exceeds horizontal advection.

    “On an annual average, nitrate is supplied by intraseasonal advection because eddy induced vertical advection exceeds horizontal advection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The amplitude and phase of the seasonal cycles of modeled temperature and zonal current compare well, although the simulated temperature and current vertical structures are too shallow.

    “The amplitude and phase of the seasonal cycles of modeled temperature and zonal current compare well, although the simulated temperature and current vertical structures are too shallow.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The results suggest that eddy horizontal advection acts to remove nitrate while eddy vertical advection feeds both the mixed and euphotic layers with nitrate.

    “Our results suggest that eddy horizontal advection acts to remove nitrate while eddy vertical advection feeds both the mixed and euphotic layers with nitrate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In this simulation, nitrate loss in the mixed layer west of 10° W is driven by eddy meridional advection and by eddy zonal advection to a lesser extent.

    “In this simulation, nitrate loss in the mixed layer west of 10° W is driven by eddy meridional advection and by eddy zonal advection to a lesser extent (not shown).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Intraseasonal advection represents about 35% of the advective nitrate input in the mixed layer and about 45% in the euphotic layer in the central equatorial Atlantic.

    “It represents a significant contribution to the nitrate budget in the central equatorial Atlantic: about 440 35% of the advective nitrate input in the mixed layer and about 45% in the euphotic layer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Cruise sampling prevents studying an entire seasonal cycle.

    “Because cruise sampling prevents from studying an entire seasonal cycle, a coupled physical-biogeochemical simulation is used to complement the nitrate and chlorophyll seasonal cycles and to investigate the processes driving this seasonality.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    There are large interannual fluctuations of the equatorial productivity.

    “This suggests large interannual fluctuations of the equatorial productivity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Monger et al., 1997 source
    • cites Signorini et al., 1999 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the equatorial Atlantic, summer and fall are cool, productive seasons characterized by efficient vertical processes that bring cold, nitrate-rich water supporting phytoplankton growth in the euphotic layer.

    “ii) a cool and productive season in summer 30 and fall characterized by efficient vertical processes that bring cold and nitrate rich water supporting the phytoplankton growth in the euphotic layer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hisard, 1973

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Voituriez and Herbland, 1977

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisecitation

    Previous studies have shown that vertical processes (equatorial divergence, vertical mixing, and vertical motion of the nitracline) are involved in setting the seasonal cycles of surface nitrate and chlorophyll.

    “Previous studies have shown that vertical processes (equatorial divergence, vertical mixing, and vertical 90 motion of the nitracline) are involved in setting the seasonal cycles of surface nitrate and chlorophyll.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The Atlantic equatorial upwelling is a region of enhanced biological production mainly driven by nitrate supply.

    “The Atlantic equatorial upwelling is a region of enhanced biological production mainly driven by nitrate supply (Voituriez and Herbland, 1977;Loukos and Mémery, 1999).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Voituriez and Herbland, 1977

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Loukos and Mémery, 1999 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Few model-based studies have addressed the influence of ocean dynamics variability on nutrient variability in the equatorial Atlantic.

    “Few model based studies have addressed the influence of the ocean dynamics variability on the nutrient variability in the equatorial Atlantic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the equatorial Atlantic, winter and spring are warm, low-productive seasons with a nitrate-depleted surface layer and a chlorophyll maximum near the top of the nitracline.

    “i) a warm and low productive season in winter and spring with a nitrate depleted surface layer and a chlorophyll maximum located near the top of the nitracline”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hisard, 1973

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Voituriez and Herbland, 1977

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The location of the thermocline/nitracline relative to the EUC depth impacts the efficiency of the upwelling.

    “Previous studies have shown that the location of the thermocline/nitracline relative to the EUC depth impacted the efficiency of the upwelling (Monger et al., 1997;Christian and Murtugudde, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Monger et al., 1997 source
    • cites Christian and Murtugudde, 2003 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The short spinup of the model is justified by the fast adjustment of the equatorial dynamics and the main focus of the study on upper ocean variability.

    “Such short spinup is justified by the fast adjustment of the equatorial dynamics and the main focus of the study which is on the upper ocean variability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Seasonal variations of chlorophyll in the equatorial Atlantic are primarily related to seasonal variability of nitrate input.

    “In the equatorial Atlantic, the seasonal variations of chlorophyll are thought to be primarily related to seasonal variability of the nitrate input (Voituriez and Herbland, 1977;Loukos and Mémery, 1999).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Voituriez and Herbland, 1977

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Loukos and Mémery, 1999 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Waters are transported westward, feed the North Brazil Undercurrent (NBUC) and are entrained within the North Brazil Current retroflection before entering the EUC.

    “Waters are transported westward, feed the North Brazil Undercurrent (NBUC) and are entrained within the North 350 Brazil Current retroflection before entering the EUC.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Acceleration of the SEC increases the vertical shear with the EUC and, in turn, increases the vertical mixing in the mixed layer.

    “Vertical advection of nitrate rich water at the base of the mixed layer favors the intensified vertical diffusion in summer and November-December (Fig. 7g), with an acceleration of the SEC which increases the vertical shear with the EUC and, in turn, increases the vertical mixing in the mixed layer (Jouanno et al., 2011b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jouanno et al., 2011b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Variations of nitrate concentration in the source waters of the NBUC may be another driver of nitrate variations in the EUC and may impact nitrate changes in the center of the basin.

    “the nitrate concentration in the source waters of the NBUC may be another driver of nitrate variations in the EUC as suggested by White (2015)”
    • Also stated in: § 6. Conclusion · hedged
      “Changes of the nitrate concentration in the source water within the NBUC may also impact nitrate changes in the center of the basin.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites White (2015) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Nitrate removal by zonal advection in the EUC contributes to decrease the vertical nitrate gradient, which, associated with a reduced vertical velocity, leads to moderate vertical nitrate supply in August-September.

    “Nitrate removal by zonal advection in the EUC contributes to decrease the vertical nitrate gradient, which, associated with a reduced vertical velocity, leads to 370 moderate vertical nitrate supply in August-September.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The seasonal nitrate supply in the center of the equatorial Atlantic is supported by vertical processes and strongly modulated by losses through horizontal advection in the EUC linked to the semiannual thermocline uplift of the nitracline.

    “The seasonal nitrate supply in the center of the equatorial Atlantic is supported by vertical processes and strongly modulated by losses through horizontal advection in the EUC linked to the semiannual thermocline uplift of the nitracline.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The 20° W-5° W, 1.5° S-0.5° N zone is affected by TIW and Kelvin waves in the 20-50 day period range, and by mixed Rossby-gravity and inertia-gravity waves at higher frequency.

    “which is affected by TIW and Kelvin waves in the 20-50 day period range, and by mixed Rossby-gravity and inertia-gravity waves at higher frequency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Strutton et al. (2001) show that chlorophyll increases because of enhanced upwelling.

    “while Strutton et al. (2001) show that chlorophyll increases because of enhanced upwelling.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Strutton et al. (2001) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    As far as horizontal eddy advection is concerned, the warming effect of zonal and meridional advections in the Pacific is consistent with the nitrate removal by zonal and meridional advections in the Atlantic.

    “As far as horizontal eddy advection is concerned, the warming effect of zonal and meridional advections in the Pacific is consistent with the nitrate removal by zonal and meridional advections in the Atlantic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Drawing an analogy between temperature and nitrate, the nitrate decrease through zonal advection could be attributed to Kelvin waves.

    “Drawing again an analogy between temperature and nitrate, the nitrate decrease through zonal advection could be attributed to Kelvin waves.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In May-July and November, the vertical velocity is strong and the nitracline gets closer to the upwelling core, allowing vertical advection to increase.

    “In May-July and November, the vertical velocity is strong and the nitracline gets closer to the upwelling core, allowing vertical advection to increase.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    This warming contribution reflects the impact of horizontal advection as TIW induced vertical advection is negligible.

    “This warming contribution reflects the impact of horizontal advection as TIW induced vertical advection is negligible.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The impact of TIW on biological production is debated, at least in the equatorial Pacific Ocean.

    “As for the heat budget, the impact of TIW on biological production is debated, at least in the equatorial Pacific Ocean.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Not yet classified.

    Premise

    Gorgues et al. (2005) show that the effect of TIW is to lower the chlorophyll concentration near the equator because iron loss through horizontal advection exceeds iron supply by vertical advection.

    “Gorgues et al. (2005) show that the effect of TIW is to lower the chlorophyll concentration near the equator because of the iron loss through horizontal advection exceeds iron supply by vertical advection”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gorgues et al. (2005) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In the upper 20 m of the equatorial Atlantic, the annual meridional advective heat flux associated with TIW was nearly offset by the vertical advective heat flux.

    “Considering the upper 20 m in the equatorial Atlantic, Jochum et al. (2004) found that the annual meridional advective heat flux associated with TIW was nearly offset by the vertical advective heat flux.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jochum et al. (2004) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Several intraseasonal processes should contribute to the seasonal nitrate loss through eddy horizontal advection and nitrate input through eddy vertical advection in the mixed layer and in the euphotic layer in the 20° W-5° W, 1.5° S-0.5° N region.

    “Several intraseasonal processes should contribute to the seasonal nitrate loss through eddy horizontal advection and nitrate input through eddy vertical advection in the mixed layer and in the euphotic layer in the 20° W-5° W, 1.5° S-0.5° N region.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Another reason would be related to the different distribution of temperature and nitrate in the mixed layer because the nitrate concentration rapidly drops to zero east of 10° W while a temperature gradient persists in this simulation.

    “Another reason would be related to the different distribution of temperature and nitrate in the mixed 435 layer because the nitrate concentration rapidly drops to zero east of 10° W while a temperature gradient persists in this simulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In the Pacific Ocean, the compensation between TIW horizontal and vertical heat advection in the mixed layer was suggested by Vialard et al. (2001).

    “In the Pacific Ocean, the compensation between the TIW horizontal and vertical heat advection in 395 the mixed layer was also suggested by Vialard et al. (2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vialard et al. (2001) source
79 of 79
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The coupled physical-biogeochemical model used in this study realistically represents the physical and biogeochemical processes of the Atlantic cold tongue, so that its nitrate budget can be used to infer the drivers of the observed chlorophyll seasonality.

    “Because cruise sampling prevents from studying an entire seasonal cycle, a coupled physical-biogeochemical simulation is used to complement the nitrate and chlorophyll seasonal cycles and to investigate the processes driving this seasonality.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mixed layer budget cannot explain alone the surface productivity.

    “In this section, processes driving the seasonal variations of nitrate are presented in the mixed layer, but also in the euphotic layer because the mixed layer budget cannot explain alone the surface productivity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No study shows the possible impact of TIW and other intraseasonal waves on the nitrate budget in the Atlantic Ocean.

    “As far as we know, no study shows the possible impact of TIW and other intraseasonal waves on nitrate budget in the Atlantic Ocean.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Figure 3 panel references are reversed

    Minor

    The text cites Figure 3b for the seasonal cycle and Figure 3a for a spatial distribution. The caption assigns the seasonal cycle to panel a and the surface distribution to panel b.

  • Observation climatology has two stated end years

    Minor

    The text describes the ocean-color archive as covering 1998-2016, but the Figure 1 caption says the chlorophyll climatology covers 1998-2015.

  • Figure 5c is cited as a vertical process

    Minor

    The discussion cites panel 5c while describing decreasing vertical processes, but the Figure 5 caption identifies 5c as zonal advection; vertical advection is panel 5e.

  • Figure 7 horizontal-advection panels are misidentified

    Minor

    The text cites panels 7c and 7d for horizontal advection, but the caption identifies 7c as nitrate change rate and assigns zonal and meridional advection to 7d and 7e.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Radenac, M.-H., Jouanno, J., Tchamabi, C. C., Awo, M., Bourlès, B., Arnault, S., & Aumont, O.
Affiliations
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
  • Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Radenac, Marie-Hélène
  • Jouanno, Julien
  • Bourlès, Bernard
  • Arnault, Sabine
  • Aumont, Olivier
Venue
Biogeosciences
Published
2020-01-31
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
529-545
ISSN
  • 1726-4170 (ISSN-L)
  • 1726-4189
OpenAlex
W2973987475
Cited by
33
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biogeosciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Institutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
  • Grand Équipement National De Calcul Intensif (GEN7298)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
nitrate, seasonal variation, Atlantic cold tongue, phytoplankton blooms, Equatorial Undercurrent, vertical advection, meridional advection, vertical diffusion, equatorial Pacific, chlorophyll

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-16.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-16.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review