Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Remote sensing of cloud properties using MODIS airborne simulator imagery during SUCCESS: 2. Cloud thermodynamic phase

Baum, Bryan A., Soulen, Peter F., Strabala, Kathleen I., King, Michael D., Ackerman, Steven A., Menzel, W. Paul, Yang, Ping·2000·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Methods to infer cloud thermodynamic phase (ice or water) are investigated using multispectral imagery. An infrared (IR) trispectral algorithm using the 8.52‐, 11‐, and 12‐μm bands [Ackerman et al., 1990; Strabala et al., 1994] forms the basis of this work and will be applied to data from the Earth Observing System (EOS) Moderate‐Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instrument. Since the algorithm uses IR bands, it can be applied to either daytime or nighttime data and is not sensitive to the presence of cloud shadows. A case study analysis is performed with a MODIS airborne simulator (MAS) scene collected during the Subsonic Aircraft Contrail and Cloud Effects Special Study (SUCCESS) on April 21, 1996, at 2000 UTC. The scene under scrutiny is quite complex, containing low‐level broken water clouds, cirrus cells, cloud shadows, sub visual cirrus, and contrails. The IR trispectral algorithm is found to be less accurate in (1) regions where more than one cloud phase type occurs and (2) regions of thin cirrus overlying a lower‐level cloud layer. To improve the phase retrieval accuracy in these areas of difficulty, additional bands located at 0.65, 1.63, and 1.90 μm are incorporated. Radiative transfer (RT) calculations are performed to simulate the MAS bands using the cirrus and water cloud models detailed by Baum et al. [this issue]. The RT calculations are performed for single‐layer cirrus‐ and water‐phase clouds as well as for the case of thin cirrus overlying a lower‐level water droplet cloud. Both modeled results and application of the theory to a case study suggest that the cloud thermodynamic phase retrieval accuracy can be improved by inclusion of the visible and near infrared bands.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/1999jd901090

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Baum, B. A., Soulen, P. F., Strabala, K. I., King, M. D., Ackerman, S. A., Menzel, W. P., & Yang, P.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2000-05
Volume
105
Issue
D9
Pages
11781-11792
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017763689
Cited by
265
References
0
FWCI
14.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remote sensing of cloud properties using MODIS airborne simulator imagery during SUCCESS: 2. Cloud thermodynamic phase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999jd901090
The paper
Baum, B. A., Soulen, P. F., Strabala, K. I., King, M. D., Ackerman, S. A., Menzel, W. P., & Yang, P. (2000). Remote sensing of cloud properties using MODIS airborne simulator imagery during SUCCESS: 2. Cloud thermodynamic phase. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd901090

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.