The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Indirect effect of sulfate and carbonaceous aerosols: A mechanistic treatment
Open accessAbstract
The indirect effect of anthropogenic aerosols, whereby aerosol particles change cloud optical properties, is the most uncertain component of climate forcing over the past 100 years. Here we use a mechanistic treatment of droplet nucleation and a prognostic treatment of the number of cloud droplets to study the indirect aerosol effect from changes in carbonaceous and sulfate aerosols. Cloud droplet nucleation is parameterized as a function of total aerosol number concentration, updraft velocity, and an activation parameter, which takes into account the mechanism of sulfate aerosol formation. Where previous studies focussed either on sulfate aerosols or carbonaceous aerosols only, here we estimate the combined effect. The combined indirect aerosol effect amounts to −1.1 W m−2 for an internally mixed aerosol and −1.5 W m−2 for an externally mixed aerosol compared to −1.4 W m−2, which we obtained by empirically relating sulfate mass to cloud droplet number. In the case of an internally mixed aerosol, the contribution from increasing carbonaceous and sulfate aerosols is close to being additive as the individual simulations yield an indirect effect of −0.4 W m−2 due to anthropogenic sulfate aerosols and −0.9 W m−2 due to anthropogenic carbonaceous aerosols. The contribution of anthropogenic sulfate to the indirect effect is close to zero if an externally mixed aerosol is assumed, while the contribution of carbonaceous aerosols increases to −1.3 W m−2. The effect of sulfate in the external mixture approach is much smaller than that of carbonaceous aerosols because its burden only increases by a third of that of carbonaceous aerosols and because the mode radius of sulfate is much larger than that of black and organic carbon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Organic aerosol and global climate modelling: a review
Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F. J., Facchini, M. C., Van Dingenen, R., Ervens, B., Nenes, A., Nielsen, C. J., et al. (2005) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005 · Cited by 3,244
Global indirect aerosol effects: a review
Lohmann, U., & Feichter, J. (2005) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-5-715-2005 · Cited by 2,606
Self-citationEstimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review
Haywood, J., & Boucher, O. (2000) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/1999rg000078 · Cited by 2,097
Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Fahey, D. W., Thomson, D. S., Watts, L. A., Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., Darbeheshti, M., Baumgardner, D. G., Kok, G. L., et al. (2006) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2006jd007076 · Cited by 772
The effect of physical and chemical aerosol properties on warm cloud droplet activation
McFiggans, G., Artaxo, P., Baltensperger, U., Coe, H., Facchini, M. C., Feingold, G., Fuzzi, S., Gysel, M., Laaksonen, A., Lohmann, U., et al. (2006) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-6-2593-2006 · Cited by 710
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lohmann, U., Feichter, J., Penner, J., & Leaitch, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- D10
- Pages
- 12193-12206
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1997635519
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indirect effect of sulfate and carbonaceous aerosols: A mechanistic treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999jd901199
- The paper
- Lohmann, U., Feichter, J., Penner, J., & Leaitch, R. (2000). Indirect effect of sulfate and carbonaceous aerosols: A mechanistic treatment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd901199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.