The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Erosional control on the geometry and kinematics of thrust belt development in the central Andes
Open accessAbstract
Long‐term erosion rates in the central Andes may have influenced not only mean elevation and relief but also the regional geometry and kinematic history of the orogenic belt. A drastic along‐strike erosional gradient exists in the modern central Andes, from a high‐erosion region directly north of the 17.5°S bend in the Andes to a low‐erosion region south of the bend. This gradient has existed since ∼10–15 Ma based on fission track analyses of middle Miocene to Holocene denudation and qualitative evaluations of the preservation potential of middle‐late Tertiary volcanic edifices and synorogenic sediment. Global positioning system velocity data indicate conflicting patterns of active surface shortening north and south of the 17.5°S bend. Whereas present‐day shortening in the thrust belt north of the bend is distributed over much of the width of the belt, south of the bend it is concentrated near the eastern frontal margin. Structural data suggest a similar kinematic situation during late Miocene to Holocene shortening: an out‐of‐sequence chronology of thrusting in the narrow (200 km wide) thrust belt to the north versus a forward‐breaking sequence of thrusting in the relatively wide (350 km wide) thrust belt to the south. The long‐term internal deformation and limited width of the thrust belt north of the bend are attributed to prolonged subcritical thrust‐wedge conditions, induced by rapid erosion rates since ∼10–15 Ma. Such conditions inhibit thrust‐front advance and favor distributed deformation within the thrust‐belt interior. In the thrust belt south of the bend, a progressive eastward migration of thrusting is interpreted to be the result of long‐term critical thrust‐wedge conditions promoted by extremely low rates of denudation since middle Miocene time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Uplift of the Central Andean Plateau and bending of the Bolivian Orocline
Isacks, B. L. (1988) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb093ib04p03211 · Cited by 1,113
A balanced model of the southern Central Andes
Schmitz, M. (1994) · Tectonics · doi:10.1029/93tc02232 · Cited by 138
Constraints on present‐day shortening rate across the central eastern Andes from GPS data
Leffler, L., Stein, S., Mao, A., Dixon, T., Ellis, M. A., Ocola, L., & Sacks, I. S. (1997) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/97gl00770 · Cited by 28
Cited by
Topographic controls on erosion rates in tectonically active mountain ranges
Montgomery, D. R., & Brandon, M. T. (2002) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/s0012-821x(02)00725-2 · Cited by 837
Oncken, O., Hindle, D., Kley, J., Elger, K., Victor, P., & Schemmann, K. (2006) · Frontiers in Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-48684-8_1 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Horton, B. K.
- Venue
- Tectonics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1292-1304
- ISSN
- 0278-7407 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9194
- OpenAlex
- W2003772089
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Erosional control on the geometry and kinematics of thrust belt development in the central Andes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999tc900051
- The paper
- Horton, B. K. (1999). Erosional control on the geometry and kinematics of thrust belt development in the central Andes. Tectonics. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999tc900051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.