The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dam nation: A geographic census of American dams and their large‐scale hydrologic impacts
Abstract
Newly available data indicate that dams fragment the fluvial system of the continental United States and that their impact on river discharge is several times greater than impacts deemed likely as a result of global climate change. The 75,000 dams in the continental United States are capable of storing a volume of water almost equaling one year's mean runoff, but there is considerable geographic variation in potential surface water impacts. In some western mountain and plains regions, dams can store more than 3 year's runoff, while in the Northeast and Northwest, storage is as little as 25% of the annual runoff. Dams partition watersheds; the drainage area per dam varies from 44 km 2 (17 miles 2) per dam in New England to 811 km 2 (313 miles 2) per dam in the Lower Colorado basin. Storage volumes, indicators of general hydrologic effects of dams, range from 26,200 m 3 km−2 (55 acre‐feet mile−2) in the Great Basin to 345,000 m 3 km−2 (725 acre‐feet mile−2) in the South Atlantic region. The greatest river flow impacts occur in the Great Plains, Rocky Mountains, and the arid Southwest, where storage is up to 3.8 times the mean annual runoff. The nation's dams store 5000 m 3 (4 acre‐feet) of water per person. Water resource regions have experienced individualized histories of cumulative increases in reservoir storage (and thus of downstream hydrologic and ecologic impacts), but the most rapid increases in storage occurred between the late 1950s and the late 1970s. Since 1980, increases in storage have been relatively minor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
High‐resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for sustainable river‐flow management
Lehner, B., Liermann, C. R., Revenga, C., Vörösmarty, C., Fekete, B., Crouzet, P., Döll, P., Endejan, M., Frenken, K., Magome, J., et al. (2011) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/100125 · Cited by 2,515
Stromberg, J. C. (2001) · Journal of Arid Environments · doi:10.1006/jare.2001.0833 · Cited by 289
Smith, K. R., Frumkin, H., Balakrishnan, K., Butler, C. D., Chafe, Z. A., Fairlie, I., Kinney, P., Kjellstrom, T., Mauzerall, D. L., McKone, T. E., et al. (2013) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114404 · Cited by 285
Designing river flows to improve food security futures in the Lower Mekong Basin
Sabo, J. L., Ruhi, A., Holtgrieve, G. W., Elliott, V., Arias, M. E., Ngor, P. B., Räsänen, T. A., & Nam, S. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao1053 · Cited by 271
River restoration by dam removal: Enhancing connectivity at watershed scales
Magilligan, F. J., Graber, B. E., Nislow, K. H., Chipman, J. W., Sneddon, C. S., & Fox, C. A. (2016) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.12952/journal.elementa.000108 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Graf, W. L.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1305-1311
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2166442513
- Cited by
- 810
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dam nation: A geographic census of American dams and their large‐scale hydrologic impacts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999wr900016
- The paper
- Graf, W. L. (1999). Dam nation: A geographic census of American dams and their large‐scale hydrologic impacts. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999wr900016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.