Cited by 260Marine and coastal ecosystemsOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

Regional variability in the vertical flux of particulate organic carbon in the ocean interior

Open access
Lutz, Michael, Dunbar, Robert, Caldeira, Ken·2002·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

Carbon transport within sinking biogenic matter in the ocean contributes to the uptake of CO 2 from the atmosphere. Here we assess the extent to which particulate organic carbon (POC) transport to the ocean’s interior can be predicted from primary production or export flux. Relationships between POC flux and depth are generally described by a uniform power law or rational decrease with depth, scaled to new or total primary production of POC. While these parameterizations of flux are used in most quantitative biogeochemical models, they are based on data sets from a limited geographic and depth range. We examine these relationships through a review of parameters derived from 14 C uptake experiments, regional remote sensing, 234 Th studies, nitrogen balances, and sediment trap records. Ocean regions considered include sites studied by the Joint Global Ocean Flux Study, Hawaii Ocean Time‐series, and Bermuda Atlantic Time‐series Study programs and involve observed and radiochemically corrected flux to depth. We demonstrate regional variability in the efficiency of the biological pump to transport organic carbon from surface waters to the ocean’s interior. Commonly applied flux relationships, while representative of some areas of the ocean, generally overestimate flux to depth. We estimate that the fraction of carbon transported as POC to depths greater than 1.5 km ranges between 0.10 and 8.8% (1.1% average) of primary production and between 0.28 and 30% (5.7% average) of export f…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000gb001383

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lutz, M., Dunbar, R., & Caldeira, K.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
2002-07-24
Volume
16
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9224
OpenAlex
W1934068109
Cited by
260
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Global Biogeochemical Cycles (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Keywords
particulate organic carbon, vertical flux, biological carbon pump, ocean interior, export production, primary production, carbon residence time, regional variation, flux parameterization, carbon sequestration, thorium-234, sediment traps, ocean carbon cycle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review