Cited by 85Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsGeophysics and Gravity Measurements

Gravitational braking of inner‐core rotation in geodynamo simulations

Open access
Buffett, Bruce A., Glatzmaier, Gary A.·2000·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

The effects of gravitational coupling between the inner core and the mantle are incorporated into numerical simulations of the geodynamo. Differential rotation between the inner core and the mantle is permitted by allowing the inner core to viscously deform. Calculations with a deformation time scale of 1 yr, corresponding to an average viscosity of 5 × 1016 Pa s, predict eastward rotation of the inner core with a mean rate of 0.02deg/yr relative to the mantle. Fluctuations about this mean rate of rotation occur with a typical period of 75 yr and have sufficient amplitude to explain observed changes in length of day at decadal periods. When gravitational coupling is removed, or viscous coupling is added by imposing no‐slip boundary conditions, the mean inner core rotation rate is almost an order of magnitude greater.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000gl011705

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gravitational coupling between the inner core and the mantle complicates the pattern of inner core rotation, resulting in non-steady rotation rates.

    “The gravitational coupling between the IC and the mantle complicates the pattern of the IC rotation, resulting in a complex system with non-steady rotation rates (Buffett, 1997;Buffett & Glatzmaier, 2000).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Roberts, P.H. and G.A. Glatzmaier, Geodynamo theory and sim- ulations, Rev. Mod. Phys., in press, 2000.

Authors
Buffett, B. A., & Glatzmaier, G. A.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2000-10
Volume
27
Issue
19
Pages
3125-3128
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2056786549
Cited by
85
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Centre for Supercomputing Applications
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Keywords
inner core rotation, geodynamo, gravitational coupling, differential rotation, viscous deformation, length of day variations, no-slip boundary condition, core-mantle boundary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review