Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 360

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved solar Lyman α irradiance modeling from 1947 through 1999 based on UARS observations

Open access
Woods, Thomas N., Tobiska, W. Kent, Rottman, Gary J., Worden, John R.·2000·Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Abstract

The solar Lyman α radiation is the brightest solar vacuum ultraviolet (VUV: λ < 200 nm) emission, and this radiation is deposited in Earth's atmosphere above 70 km. The Lyman α irradiance and its variability are therefore important for many studies of the Earth's upper atmosphere. A long‐term data set of the solar Lyman α irradiance from 1947 through 1999 is constructed using the measurements from the Atmospheric Explorer E (AE‐E), the Solar Mesospheric Explorer (SME), and the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS) along with predictions from proxy models to fill in data gaps and to extrapolate back to 1947. The UARS measurement is used as the reference, and the AE‐E and SME measurements and the proxy models are adjusted to agree with the UARS values. The estimated 1‐σ uncertainty for this long‐term Lyman α time series is 10%. The average solar rotation (27‐day) variability in Lyman α is 9% from this composite times series, and the solar rotation variability averaged over 2 years at solar minimum and maximum conditions is 5 and 11%, respectively. The average solar cycle (11‐year) variability is a factor of 1.5 when the data are smoothed over 2 years, and the extreme Lyman α variability is a factor of 2.1. The Lyman α irradiances averaged over 2 years during solar minimum and maximum conditions are 3.7 and 5.6 × 10 11 photons s−1 cm−2, respectively. The proxy models include three components to better fit the UARS measurements; nonetheless, there remain differences between the proxy models and the observed Lyman α irradiance, which are related to the source of the Lyman α radiation being different than that for the proxies. The available proxies are primarily chromospheric and coronal emissions, whereas the Lyman α variability is manifested more in the transition region. It is shown that emissions throughout the chromosphere, transition region, and corona vary differently mainly because their contrasts for active network and plage components are different. A transition region proxy is needed to improve the empirical proxy models of solar irradiance, and this composite Lyman α time series could serve as a proxy for other transition region emissions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000ja000051

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 360

Metadata

Authors
Woods, T. N., Tobiska, W. K., Rottman, G. J., & Worden, J. R.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Published
2000-12
Volume
105
Issue
A12
Pages
27195-27215
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018328868
Cited by
360
References
21
FWCI
10.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved solar Lyman α irradiance modeling from 1947 through 1999 based on UARS observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000ja000051
The paper
Woods, T. N., Tobiska, W. K., Rottman, G. J., & Worden, J. R. (2000). Improved solar Lyman α irradiance modeling from 1947 through 1999 based on UARS observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000ja000051

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.