Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DMSP observations of equatorial plasma bubbles in the topside ionosphere near solar maximum

Open access
Huang, C. Y., Burke, W. J., Machuzak, J. S., Gentile, L. C., Sultan, P. J.·2001·Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Abstract

The Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) flights F9 and F10 crossed postsunset local time sectors approximately 14 times per day in Sun‐synchronous orbits at an altitude of ∼840 km. We have examined a large database of postsunset plasma density measurements acquired during ∼ 15,000 equatorial crossings made by DMSP F9 in 1989 and 1991 and DMSP F10 in 1991. On 2086 of these crossings equatorial plasma bubbles (EPBs) were observed as intervals of depleted and irregular plasma densities. We have analyzed these EPB events to determine their distributions with season, longitude (S/L), and levels of geomagnetic activity. The global S/L distributions of EPBs observed by the DMSP satellites are shown to be in general agreement with results from discrete ground‐based measurements. That is, the seasonal variations detected at 840 km in longitude bins hosting radar/scintillation observatories appear similar to those reported from the ground. Over the Atlantic sector where EPBs occur frequently, we found good agreement with predictions of a simple model proposed by Tsunoda [1985]. In the Pacific sector the frequency of EPB occurrence is considerably lower, and poor counting statistics preclude confident predictions regarding the absolute value of seasonal variations. We suggest that relatively large equatorial magnetic fields at Flayer altitudes in the Pacific (∼0.34 G) sector more strongly inhibit the growth of the Rayleigh‐Taylor instability than at Atlantic (∼0.25 G) longitudes. Contrary to general belief, we found that EPBs occurred regularly during geomagnetic storms, especially in the initial and main phases. EPB activity appears to have been suppressed from many hours to clays during storm recovery phases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000ja000319

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Huang, C. Y., Burke, W. J., Machuzak, J. S., Gentile, L. C., & Sultan, P. J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Published
2001-05
Volume
106
Issue
A5
Pages
8131-8142
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034707363
Cited by
181
References
1
FWCI
5.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DMSP observations of equatorial plasma bubbles in the topside ionosphere near solar maximum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000ja000319
The paper
Huang, C. Y., Burke, W. J., Machuzak, J. S., Gentile, L. C., & Sultan, P. J. (2001). DMSP observations of equatorial plasma bubbles in the topside ionosphere near solar maximum. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000ja000319

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.