Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Longitudinal variability of equatorial plasma bubbles observed by DMSP and ROCSAT‐1

Open access
Burke, W. J., Gentile, L. C., Huang, C. Y., Valladares, C. E., Su, S. Y.·2004·Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Abstract

We compare observations of equatorial plasma bubbles (EPBs) by polar‐orbiting satellites of the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) with plasma density measurements from the Republic of China Satellite (ROCSAT‐1) in a low‐inclination orbit. DMSP data were acquired in the evening sector at low magnetic latitudes between 1989 and 2002. ROCSAT‐1 plasma densities were measured in March and April of 2000 and 2002. Observations of individual EPBs detected by both ROCSAT‐1 and DMSP were well correlated when satellite orbital paths crossed the same longitude within approximately ±15 min. We compiled a statistical database of ROCSAT‐1 EPB occurrence rates sorted by magnetic local time (MLT), magnetic latitude, and geographic longitude. The rate of ROCSAT‐1 EPB encounters at topside altitudes rose rapidly after 1930 MLT and peaked between 2000 and 2200 MLT, close to the orbital planes of DMSP F12, F14, and F15. EPB encounter rates have Gaussian distributions centered on the magnetic equator with half widths of ∼8°. Longitudinal distributions observed by ROCSAT‐1 and DMSP are qualitatively similar, with both showing significantly fewer occurrences than expected near the west coast of South America. A chain of GPS receivers extending from Colombia to Chile measured a west‐to‐east gradient in S4 indices that independently confirms the existence of a steep longitudinal gradient in EPB occurrence rates. We suggest that precipitation of energetic particles from the inner radiation belt causes the dearth of EPBs. Enhancements in the postsunset ionospheric conductance near the South Atlantic Anomaly cause a decrease in growth rate for the generalized Rayleigh‐Taylor instability. Results indicate substantial agreement between ROCSAT‐1 and DMSP observations and provide new insights on EPB phenomenology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2004ja010583

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Burke, W. J., Gentile, L. C., Huang, C. Y., Valladares, C. E., & Su, S. Y.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Published
2004-12
Volume
109
Issue
A12
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036192464
Cited by
317
References
20
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Longitudinal variability of equatorial plasma bubbles observed by DMSP and ROCSAT‐1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2004ja010583
The paper
Burke, W. J., Gentile, L. C., Huang, C. Y., Valladares, C. E., & Su, S. Y. (2004). Longitudinal variability of equatorial plasma bubbles observed by DMSP and ROCSAT‐1. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004ja010583

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.