The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
REVEL: A model for Recent plate velocities from space geodesy
Abstract
We present a new global model for Recent plate velocities, REVEL, describing the relative velocities of 19 plates and continental blocks. The model is derived from publicly available space geodetic (primarily GPS) data for the period 1993–2000. We include an independent and rigorous estimate for GPS velocity uncertainties to assess plate rigidity and propagate these uncertainties to the velocity estimates. The velocity fields for North America, Eurasia, and Antarctica clearly show the effects of glacial isostatic adjustment, and Australia appears to depart from rigid plate behavior in a manner consistent with the mapped intraplate stress field. Two thirds of tested plate pairs agree with the NUVEL‐1A geologic (3 Myr average) velocities within uncertainties. Three plate pairs (Caribbean–North America, Caribbean–South America, and North America–Pacific) exhibit significant differences between the geodetic and geologic model that may reflect systematic errors in NUVEL‐1A due to the use of seafloor magnetic rate data that do not reflect the full plate rate because of tectonic complexities. Most other differences probably reflect real velocity changes over the last few million years. Several plate pairs (Arabia–Eurasia, Arabia–Nubia, Eurasia–India) move more slowly than the 3 Myr NUVEL‐1A average, perhaps reflecting long‐term deceleration associated with continental collision. Several other plate pairs, including Nazca–Pacific, Nazca–South America and Nubia–South America, are experiencing slowing that began ∼25 Ma, the beginning of the current phase of Andean crustal shortening.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Back‐arc opening and the mode of subduction
Uyeda, S., & Kanamori, H. (1979) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb084ib03p01049 · Cited by 1,286
Current plate motions across the Red Sea
Chu, D., & Gordon, R. G. (1998) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00658.x · Cited by 235
Cited by
Geologically current plate motions
DeMets, C., Gordon, R. G., & Argus, D. F. (2010) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.2009.04491.x · Cited by 2,741
Ice Ages and the mitochondrial DNA chronology of human dispersals: a review
Forster, P. (2004) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1394 · Cited by 316
Observation of glacial isostatic adjustment in “stable” North America with GPS
Sella, G. F., Stein, S., Dixon, T. H., Craymer, M., James, T. S., Mazzotti, S., & Dokka, R. K. (2007) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2006gl027081 · Cited by 312
Self-citationA Review of the Role of Subduction Dynamics for Regional and Global Plate Motions
Becker, T. W., & Faccenna, C. (2009) · Frontiers in Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87974-9_1 · Cited by 70
GPS coordinate time series measurements in Ontario and Quebec, Canada
Samadi Alinia, H., Tiampo, K. F., & James, T. S. (2017) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-016-0987-5 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Sella, G. F., Dixon, T. H., & Mao, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- B4
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983091118
- Cited by
- 1,117
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: REVEL: A model for Recent plate velocities from space geodesy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000jb000033
- The paper
- Sella, G. F., Dixon, T. H., & Mao, A. (2002). REVEL: A model for Recent plate velocities from space geodesy. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb000033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.