The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Observation of glacial isostatic adjustment in “stable” North America with GPS
Abstract
Motions of three hundred and sixty Global Positioning System (GPS) sites in Canada and the United States yield a detailed image of the vertical and horizontal velocity fields within the nominally stable interior of the North American plate. By far the strongest signal is the effect of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) due to ice mass unloading during deglaciation. Vertical velocities show present‐day uplift (∼10 mm/yr) near Hudson Bay, the site of thickest ice at the last glacial maximum. The uplift rates generally decrease with distance from Hudson Bay and change to subsidence (1–2 mm/yr) south of the Great Lakes. The “hinge line” separating uplift from subsidence is consistent with data from water level gauges along the Great Lakes, showing uplift along the northern shores and subsidence along the southern ones. Horizontal motions show outward motion from Hudson Bay with complex local variations especially in the far field. Although the vertical motions are generally consistent with the predictions of GIA models, the horizontal data illustrate the need and opportunity to improve the models via more accurate descriptions of the ice load and laterally variable mantle viscosity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GPS time series measurements indicate that the contemporary strain rate in the OBG is relatively low.
“Although, GPS time series measurements indicate that the contemporary strain rate in the OBG is relatively low”
From Tectonic geomorphology of the Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben, Eastern Canada: implications for regional uplift and intraplate seismicity (2023) · cites this paper as Sella et al. 2007
GPS time series reveal that vertical velocities vary spatially, with uplift predominantly in the Hudson Bay region to the north and mostly subsidence in the Great Lakes region to the south.
“the GPS time series reveal that vertical velocities vary spatially, with uplift predominantly occurring in the Hudson Bay region to the north, and mostly subsidence occurring in the Great Lakes region to the south”
From Tectonic geomorphology of the Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben, Eastern Canada: implications for regional uplift and intraplate seismicity (2023) · cites this paper as Sella et al. 2007
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- Argus D. F., 1999, Glacial isostatic adjustment observed using very long baseline interferometry and satellite laser ranging geodesy, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 29,077, 10.1029/1999JB000237 · DOI
- 10.1029/2005JB004253 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0277-3791(01)00070-1 · DOI
- Craymer M. R., 2006, The Evolution of NAD83 in Canada, Geomatica, 60, 151
- Crone A. J. andR. L.Wheeler(2000) Data for Quaternary faults liquefaction features and possible tectonic features in the central and eastern United States east of the Rocky Mountain Front U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep. 00‐0260 342 pp. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.03.022 · DOI
- 10.1029/1998TC001088 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0277-3791(01)00095-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1029/2000JB000049 · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0175:DDTISI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- Henton J. A., 2006, Crustal motion and deformation monitoring of the Canadian landmass, Geomatica, 60, 173
- 10.1029/94GL01854 · DOI
- 10.1029/93GL00865 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb01539.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb00003.x · DOI
- 10.1029/2000GL012611 · DOI
- 10.1029/2000GL011946 · DOI
- 10.1029/2004GL021454 · DOI
- 10.1130/B25392.1 · DOI
- 10.1029/1998JB900033 · DOI
- 10.1029/2004JB003510 · DOI
- 10.1029/2004JB003590 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1365-246x.1999.00971.x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1057022 · DOI
- 10.1029/93GL02043 · DOI
- 10.1029/2001JB001676 · DOI
- 10.1029/2001GL013782 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.265.5169.195 · DOI
- 10.1029/98RG02638 · DOI
- 10.1029/98GL00182 · DOI
- 10.1002/jqs.713 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.earth.32.082503.144359 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10291-004-0110-x · DOI
- G. Schubert D. Turcotte P. Olson 2001 Cambridge Univ. Press New York
- 10.1029/2000JB000033 · DOI
- Sella G., 2004, GPS observation of glacial isostatic adjustment in North America, Cah. Cent. Eur. Geod. Seismol., 23, 105
- 10.1190/1.1442837 · DOI
- 10.1029/GL006i007p00537 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-009-2311-9_14 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quascirev.2003.08.004 · DOI
- 10.1029/90JB01583 · DOI
- 10.1029/98EO00426 · DOI
- 10.1029/1999GL011070 · DOI
- Wu P. andS.Mazzotti(2006) Effects of a lithospheric weak zone on postglacial seismotectonics in eastern Canada and northeastern USA inContinental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science Hazard and Policy Issues edited byS.Stein andS.Mazzotti Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. in press. · DOI
- 10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00199-7 · DOI
- 10.1029/96JB03860 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gusti, U. K., Peace, A. L., & Rimando, J. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjes-2022-0137 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Sella, G. F., Stein, S., Dixon, T. H., Craymer, M., James, T. S., Mazzotti, S., & Dokka, R. K.
- Affiliations
- National Geodetic Survey NOAA Silver Spring Maryland USA
- Department of Geological Sciences Northwestern University Evanston Illinois USA
- Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences University of Miami Miami Florida USA
- Geodetic Survey Division Natural Resources Canada Ottawa, Ontario Canada
- Geological Survey of Canada Natural Resources Canada Sidney, British Columbia Canada
- Center for GeoInformatics and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Louisiana State University Baton Rouge Louisiana USA
- Venue
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0094-8276
- 1944-8007
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review