The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Implications of sediment‐flux‐dependent river incision models for landscape evolution
Open accessAbstract
Developing a quantitative understanding of the factors that control the rate of river incision into bedrock is critical to studies of landscape evolution and the linkages between climate, erosion, and tectonics. Current models of long‐term river network incision differ significantly in their treatment of the role of sediment flux. We analyze the implications of various sediment‐flux‐dependent incision models for large‐scale topography, in an attempt (1) to identify quantifiable and diagnostic differences between models that could be detected from topographic data or from the transient responses of perturbed systems and (2) to explain the apparent ubiquity of mixed bedrock‐alluvial channels in active orogens. Although certain forms of the various models can be discarded as inconsistent with morphological data, we find that the relative intrinsic concavity indices of detachment‐ and transport‐limited systems (defined herein) largely dictate whether the various models can be tied to distinctive steady state morphologies. Preliminary data suggest that no such diagnostic differences may exist, and other methods must be developed to test models. Accordingly, we develop and explore differences in the scaling behavior of topographic relief and the extent of detachment‐ versus transport‐limited channels as a function of rock uplift rate that may allow discrimination among various models. Further, we explore potentially diagnostic differences in the rates and patterns of transient channel response to changes in rock uplift rate. In addition to general differences between detachment‐ and transport‐limited systems our analysis identifies an interesting hysteresis in landscape evolution: “hybrid” channels at the threshold between detachment‐ and transport‐limited conditions are expected to act as detachment‐limited systems in response to an increase in rock uplift rate (or base level fall) and as transport‐limited systems in response to a decrease in rock uplift rate, especially during postorogenic topographic decline. The analyses presented set the stage for field studies designed to test quantitatively the various river incision models that have been proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Whipple, K. X., & Tucker, G. E. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/1999jb900120 · Cited by 2,225
Self-citationStudies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland
Hack, J. T. (1957) · Professional Paper · doi:10.3133/pp294b · Cited by 1,623
A detachment‐limited model of drainage basin evolution
Howard, A. D. (1994) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/94wr00757 · Cited by 1,255
On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data
Tarboton, D. G., Bras, R. L., & Rodriguez‐Iturbe, I. (1991) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.3360050107 · Cited by 1,209
Stream gradient as a function of order, magnitude, and discharge
Flint, J. J. (1974) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr010i005p00969 · Cited by 945
Snyder, N. P., Whipple, K. X., Tucker, G. E., & Merritts, D. J. (2000) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/0016-7606(2000)112<1250:lrttfd>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 932
Self-citationHOWARD, A. D., & KERBY, G. (1983) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1983)94<739:ccib>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 925
HOOVER MACKIN, J. (1948) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1948)59[463:cotgr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 889
Quantifying differential rock-uplift rates via stream profile analysis
Kirby, E., & Whipple, K. (2001) · Geology · doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0415:qdrurv>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 862
Self-citationModeling fluvial erosion on regional to continental scales
Howard, A. D., Dietrich, W. E., & Seidl, M. A. (1994) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/94jb00744 · Cited by 787
Cited by
Expression of active tectonics in erosional landscapes
Kirby, E., & Whipple, K. X. (2012) · Journal of Structural Geology · doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2012.07.009 · Cited by 1,093
Self-citationAn integral approach to bedrock river profile analysis
Perron, J. T., & Royden, L. (2013) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3302 · Cited by 832
A mechanistic model for river incision into bedrock by saltating bed load
Sklar, L. S., & Dietrich, W. E. (2004) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2003wr002496 · Cited by 759
Crosby, B. T., & Whipple, K. X. (2006) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.08.023 · Cited by 632
Self-citationTectonic and lithologic controls on bedrock channel profiles and processes in coastal California
Duvall, A., Kirby, E., & Burbank, D. (2004) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface · doi:10.1029/2003jf000086 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Whipple, K. X., & Tucker, G. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- B2
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038915357
- Cited by
- 687
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 27.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implications of sediment‐flux‐dependent river incision models for landscape evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000jb000044
- The paper
- Whipple, K. X., & Tucker, G. E. (2002). Implications of sediment‐flux‐dependent river incision models for landscape evolution. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb000044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.