Cited by 1,983

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Air pressure and cosmogenic isotope production

Stone, John O.·2000·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

The cosmic ray flux increases at higher altitude as air pressure and the shielding effect of the atmosphere decrease. Altitude‐dependent scaling factors are required to compensate for this effect in calculating cosmic ray exposure ages. Scaling factors in current use assume a uniform relationship between altitude and atmospheric pressure over the Earth's surface. This masks regional differences in mean annual pressure and spatial variation in cosmogenic isotope production rates. Outside Antarctica, air pressures over land depart from the standard atmosphere by ±4.4 hPa (1σ) near sea level, corresponding to offsets of ±3–4% in isotope production rates. Greater offsets occur in regions of persistent high and low pressure such as Siberia and Iceland, where conventional scaling factors predict production rates in error by ±10%. The largest deviations occur over Antarctica where ground level pressures are 20–40 hPa lower than the standard atmosphere at all altitudes. Isotope production rates in Antarctica are therefore 25–30% higher than values calculated by scaling Northern Hemisphere production rates with conventional scaling factors. Exposure ages of old Antarctic surfaces, especially those based on cosmogenic radionuclides at levels close to saturation, may be millions of years younger than published estimates.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000jb900181

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A sea level high latitude spallation production rate of 4.02±0.32 at.g−1.a−1 was used and scaled using Stone's polynomials.

    “A sea level high latitude spallation production rate of 4.02±0.32 at.g⁻¹.a⁻¹69 was used and scaled using Stone’s polynomials70.”

    From Javanese homo erectus on the move in SE asia circa 1.8 ma (2022) · cites this paper as [70]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1029/93JD00104 · DOI
  2. 10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<1063:COAEAU>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1029/95GL00167 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00003-4 · DOI
  5. 10.1006/qres.1995.1081 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRev.79.749 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0012-821X(99)00310-6 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0168-583X(96)00714-8 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0168-583X(96)00702-1 · DOI
  10. 10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<1007:MBEAOE>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/0012-821X(91)90220-C · DOI
  12. 10.1007/978-3-642-46079-1_7 · DOI
  13. Lide D. R., 1999, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 14‐16
  14. 10.1016/0012-821X(95)00169-D · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0031-0182(91)90170-V · DOI
  16. 10.1029/JB094iB12p17907 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0012-821X(91)90221-3 · DOI
  18. 10.1029/96JB02270 · DOI
  19. 10.1017/S0954102096000284 · DOI
  20. 10.1029/JD092iD04p04241 · DOI
  21. Rossi B., 1952, High Energy Particles
  22. 10.1016/S0012-821X(99)00029-1 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00369-4 · DOI
  24. 10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0587:EDAVOP>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/0168-583X(94)96026-7 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0277-3791(91)90020-U · DOI
  27. 10.1130/0091-7613(1984)12<287:CMSAIV>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0012-821X(91)90123-Y · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stone, J. O.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
2000-10-10
Volume
105
Issue
B10
Pages
23753-23759
ISSN
0148-0227
Cited by
1,983
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review