Cited by 113Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyArchaeology and Rock Art StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

Further constraints on the Chauvet cave artwork elaboration

Open access
Sadier, Benjamin, Delannoy, Jean-Jacques, Benedetti, Lucilla, Bourlès, Didier L., Jaillet, Stéphane, Geneste, Jean-Michel, Lebatard, Anne-Elisabeth, Arnold, Maurice·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Since its discovery, the Chauvet cave elaborate artwork called into question our understanding of Palaeolithic art evolution and challenged traditional chronological benchmarks [Valladas H et al. (2001) Nature 413:419–479]. Chronological approaches revealing human presences in the cavity during the Aurignacian and the Gravettian are indeed still debated on the basis of stylistic criteria [Pettitt P (2008) J Hum Evol 55:908–917]. The presented 36 Cl Cosmic Ray Exposure ages demonstrate that the cliff overhanging the Chauvet cave has collapsed several times since 29 ka until the sealing of the cavity entrance prohibited access to the cave at least 21 ka ago. Remarkably agreeing with the radiocarbon dates of the human and animal occupancy, this study confirms that the Chauvet cave paintings are the oldest and the most elaborate ever discovered, challenging our current knowledge of human cognitive evolution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1118593109

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sadier, B., Delannoy, J.-J., Benedetti, L., Bourlès, D. L., Jaillet, S., Geneste, J.-M., Lebatard, A.-E., & Arnold, M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel : Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie (FR)
  • Aix Marseille Univ., Centre Européen de Recherche et d'Enseignement des Géosciences de l'Environnement, Unité Mixte de Recherche Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique, 7330, BP 80, 13545 Aix-en-Provence, France; and
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-05-07
Volume
109
Issue
21
Pages
8002-8006
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2113925018
Cited by
113
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
56.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
Chauvet Cave, cave paintings, Paleolithic art, Aurignacian, Gravettian, human occupation, radiocarbon dating, human cognitive evolution
MeSH terms
Anthropology, Cultural, Archaeology, Cultural Evolution, France, Humans, Paintings, History, Ancient, Radiometric Dating, Remote Sensing Technology, Caves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review