Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 516

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the conditions for lower crustal convective instability

Jull, M., Kelemen, P. B.·2001·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

Continental crust is thought to be formed as a result of arc magmatism, but many of the lavas produced in these settings are basaltic, while those that are silicic are commonly evolved, with lower Mg #s than the continental crust. The bulk composition of continental crust can be produced by mixing of end‐member basaltic and silicic compositions, via magma mixing or in mechanical, tectonic juxtaposition, but some process is required to remove the cumulates and residues formed during generation of the silicic, “granitic” end‐member. We consider convective instability of dense mafic and ultramafic lower crust as a means to remove mafic residues of basalt differentiation in order to produce end‐member compositions that can mix to form the bulk composition of the continental crust. Using a range of lower crustal and mantle bulk compositions, ranging from mafic and ultramafic cumulates to primary liquid compositions, we calculated the subsolidus phase assemblage and resulting density. The results show that densities of likely lower crustal lithologies can exceed those of the mantle (by ∼50–250 kg m−3), but the density contrast is a strong function of composition, temperature, and pressure. For a “cold” geotherm with a Moho temperature of 300°C, relevant to cratonic settings, densities of all of the lower crustal compositions that we considered, except granulite, exceed the density of the underlying mantle at pressures as low as 0.8 GPa. For a “hot” geotherm with a Moho temperature in the range of 800–1000°C, the density of the lower crust is much more variable, with gabbroic and granulite compositions having lower densities than the mantle, while “arc gabbronorite” and ultramafic cumulate compositions having higher densities than the mantle at pressures similar to that for the cold geotherm. Instability times calculated for a two‐dimensional Rayleigh‐Taylor convective instability, where a dense lower crustal layer sinks into a lower‐density mantle, show that high temperatures (>700°C, or >500°C with a background strain rate) are required for this process to occur on a timescale of 10 Myr with rheological parameters expected for the crust and mantle. The high temperature required for dense lower crustal mafic‐ultramafic cumulates to sink into the mantle suggests that this process is restricted to arcs, volcanic rifted margins, and continental regions that are undergoing extension, are underlain by a mantle plume, or have had part of the conductive upper mantle removed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000jb900357

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Cited by

See all 516

Metadata

Authors
Jull, M., & Kelemen, P. B.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
2001-04-10
Volume
106
Issue
B4
Pages
6423-6446
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045066141
Cited by
516
References
63
FWCI
12.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the conditions for lower crustal convective instability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000jb900357
The paper
Jull, M., & Kelemen, P. B. (2001). On the conditions for lower crustal convective instability. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb900357

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.