The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thermal thickness and evolution of Precambrian lithosphere: A global study
Abstract
The thermal thickness of Precambrian lithosphere is modeled and compared with estimates from seismic tomography and xenolith data. We use the steady state thermal conductivity equation with the same geothermal constraints for all of the Precambrian cratons (except Antarctica) to calculate the temperature distribution in the stable continental lithosphere. The modeling is based on the global compilation of heat flow data by Pollack et al. [1993] and more recent data. The depth distribution of heat‐producing elements is estimated using regional models for ∼300 blocks with sizes varying from 1°×1° to about 5°×5° in latitude and longitude and is constrained by laboratory, seismic and petrologic data and, where applicable, empirical heat flow/heat production relationships. Maps of the lateral temperature distribution at depths 50, 100, and 150 km are presented for all continents except Antarctica. The thermal thickness of the lithosphere is calculated assuming a conductive layer overlying the mantle with an adiabat of 1300°C. The Archean and early Proterozoic lithosphere is found to have two typical thicknesses, 200–220 km and 300–350 km. In general, thin (∼220 km) roots are found for Archean and early Proterozoic cratons in the Southern Hemisphere (South Africa, Western Australia, South America, and India) and thicker (>300 km) roots are found in the Northern Hemisphere (Baltic Shield, Siberian Platform, West Africa, and possibly the Canadian Shield). We find that the thickness of continental lithosphere generally decreases with age from >200 km beneath Archean cratons to intermediate values of 200±50 km in early Proterozoic lithosphere, to about 140±50 km in middle and late Proterozoic cratons. Using known crustal thickness, our calculated geotherms, and assuming that isostatic balance is achieved at the base of the lithosphere, we find that Archean and early Proterozoic mantle lithosphere is 1.5% less dense (chemically depleted) than the underlying asthenosphere, while middle and late Proterozoic subcrustal lithosphere should be depleted by ∼0.6–0.7%. Our results suggest three contrasting stages of lithosphere formation at the following ages: >2.5 Ga, 2.5–1.8 Ga, and <1.8 Ga. Ages of komatiites, greenstone belts, and giant dike swarms broadly define similar stages and apparently reflect secular changes in mantle temperature and, possibly, convection patterns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nature and composition of the continental crust: A lower crustal perspective
Rudnick, R. L., & Fountain, D. M. (1995) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/95rg01302 · Cited by 3,323
Seismic velocity structure and composition of the continental crust: A global view
Christensen, N. I., & Mooney, W. D. (1995) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/95jb00259 · Cited by 2,952
Self-citationOn the regional variation of heat flow, geotherms, and lithospheric thickness
Pollack, H. N., & Chapman, D. S. (1977) · Tectonophysics · doi:10.1016/0040-1951(77)90215-3 · Cited by 1,049
Thermal conductivity of Earth materials at high temperatures
Schatz, J. F., & Simmons, G. (1972) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jb077i035p06966 · Cited by 445
The mechanisms of petrogenesis of the Archaean continental crust—comparison with modern processes
Martin, H. (1993) · Lithos · doi:10.1016/0024-4937(93)90046-f · Cited by 247
Cooling of the Earth in the Archaean: Consequences of pressure-release melting in a hotter mantle
Vlaar, N. J., van Keken, P. E., & van den Berg, A. P. (1994) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(94)90028-0 · Cited by 128
Cited by
Artemieva, I. M. (2006) · Tectonophysics · doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2005.11.022 · Cited by 526
Self-citationDistinct lateral variation of lithospheric thickness in the Northeastern North China Craton
Chen, L., Tao, W., Zhao, L., & Zheng, T. (2008) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2007.11.024 · Cited by 326
The contribution of metamorphic petrology to understanding lithosphere evolution and geodynamics
Brown, M. (2014) · Geoscience Frontiers · doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2014.02.005 · Cited by 279
Thickness of the central and eastern European lithosphere as seen by S receiver functions
Geissler, W. H., Sodoudi, F., & Kind, R. (2010) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.2010.04548.x · Cited by 114
Ávila, P., & Dávila, F. M. (2018) · Tectonophysics · doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2018.10.006 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Artemieva, I. M., & Mooney, W. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2001-08-10
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- B8
- Pages
- 16387-16414
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986738852
- Cited by
- 882
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 24.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thermal thickness and evolution of Precambrian lithosphere: A global study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000jb900439
- The paper
- Artemieva, I. M., & Mooney, W. D. (2001). Thermal thickness and evolution of Precambrian lithosphere: A global study. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb900439
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.