The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assimilation of surface velocity data into a primitive equation coastal ocean model
Abstract
A data assimilation system (DAS) of the wind‐driven, mesoscale shelf circulation off the Oregon coast is developed. The DAS assimilates low‐pass filtered surface velocity measurements, obtained from land‐based high‐frequency coastal radar arrays, into a primitive equation coastal ocean model using a sequential optimal interpolation scheme. Inhomogeneous and anisotropic estimates of the forecast error covariances required for the assimilation are assumed to be proportional to typical cross‐correlations between modeled variables. These correlations are estimated from an ensemble of model simulations for 18 different summers. Similarly, the observation error covariances are assumed to be proportional to the actual covariances of the observations. A time‐distributed averaging procedure (TDAP) that effectively low‐pass filters the model forecast for comparison with the observations and introduces the corrections to the model state gradually over time is used in order to overcome problems of data compatibility and initialization. The correlations between direct subsurface current measurements and subsurface currents obtained from model‐only and assimilation experiments for the summer of 1998 are 0.42 and 0.78, respectively, demonstrating the effectiveness of the DAS. Our estimates of the error covariances are shown to be appropriate through a series of objective statistical tests. Analysis of the term balances of the model equations show that the dominant modeled dynamical balances are preserved by the DAS and that uncertainties in the spatial variability of the wind forcing are likely to be one source of model error. By varying the relative magnitudes of the estimated forecast and observation error covariances the DAS is shown to be most effective when approximately 80% of the analysis is made up of the model solution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The last millennium climate reanalysis project: Framework and first results
Hakim, G. J., Emile‐Geay, J., Steig, E. J., Noone, D., Anderson, D. M., Tardif, R., Steiger, N., & Perkins, W. A. (2016) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/2016jd024751 · Cited by 293
Assessing the impact of observations on ocean forecasts and reanalyses: part 1, global studies.
Oke, P. R., Larnicol, G., Fujii, Y., Smith, G. C., Lea, D. J., Guinehut, S., Remy, E., Balmaseda, M. A., Rykova, T., Surcel-Colan, D., et al. (2015) · Journal of Operational Oceanography · doi:10.1080/1755876x.2015.1022067 · Cited by 82
Self-citation(2003) · doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2003)33<753:esadot>2.0.co;2
Metadata
- Authors
- Oke, P. R., Allen, J. S., Miller, R. N., Egbert, G. D., & Kosro, P. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- C9
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110795703
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assimilation of surface velocity data into a primitive equation coastal ocean model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000jc000511
- The paper
- Oke, P. R., Allen, J. S., Miller, R. N., Egbert, G. D., & Kosro, P. M. (2002). Assimilation of surface velocity data into a primitive equation coastal ocean model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jc000511
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.