The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An optimal definition for ocean mixed layer depth
Open accessAbstract
A new method is introduced for determining ocean isothermal layer depth (ILD) from temperature profiles and ocean mixed layer depth (MLD) from density profiles that can be applied in all regions of the world's oceans. This method can accommodate not only in situ data but also climatological data sets that typically have much lower vertical resolution. The sensitivity of the ILD and MLD to the temperature difference criteria used in the surface layer depth definition is discussed by using temperature and density data, respectively: (1) from 11 ocean weather stations in the northeast Pacific and (2) from the World Ocean Atlas 1994. Using these two data sets, a detailed statistical error analysis is presented for the ILD and MLD estimation by season. MLD variations with location due to temperature and salinity are properly accounted for in the defining density (Δσt) criterion. Overall, the optimal estimate of turbulent mixing penetration is obtained using a MLD definition of Δ T =0.8°0, although in the northeast Pacific region the optimal MLD criterion is found to vary seasonally. The method is shown to produce layer depths that are accurate to within 20 m or better in 85% or more of the cases. The MLD definition presented in this investigation accurately represents the depth to which turbulent mixing has penetrated and would be a useful aid for validation of one‐dimensional bulk mixed layer models and ocean general circulation models with an embedded mixed layer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oceanic vertical mixing: A review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization
Large, W. G., McWilliams, J. C., & Doney, S. C. (1994) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/94rg01872 · Cited by 4,443
Cited by
Zahariev, K., Christian, J. R., & Denman, K. L. (2008) · Progress In Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2008.01.007 · Cited by 108
Derived ocean features for dynamic ocean management
Research, C. O. A. A., Hobday, A., & Hartog, J. (2014) · Oceanography · doi:10.5670/oceanog.2014.92 · Cited by 80
Whitlock, R. E., Hazen, E. L., Walli, A., Farwell, C., Bograd, S. J., Foley, D. G., Castleton, M., & Block, B. A. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1400270 · Cited by 75
Taboada, F. G., & Anadón, R. (2012) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0485-6 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Kara, A. B., Rochford, P. A., & Hurlburt, H. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2000-07-15
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- C7
- Pages
- 16803-16821
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044971647
- Cited by
- 815
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An optimal definition for ocean mixed layer depth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000jc900072
- The paper
- Kara, A. B., Rochford, P. A., & Hurlburt, H. E. (2000). An optimal definition for ocean mixed layer depth. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jc900072
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.