Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 372

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Kilometer‐scale roughness of Mars: Results from MOLA data analysis

Open access
Kreslavsky, Mikhail A., Head, James W.·2000·Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets

Abstract

The Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) data are used to characterize the kilometer‐scale surface roughness of Mars. The median absolute value of the differential slope at a given baseline is proposed as a data‐derived measure of the surface roughness at this scale. Study of the scale dependence of roughness for the smoothest terrains gives an independent estimate of 20 cm for MOLA ranging accuracy. The baseline lengths from 0.6 to ∼20 km are used, and kilometer‐scale roughness is mapped for the entire surface. The maps show that different geological units have distinctive roughness characteristics. Scale dependence of roughness for a number of geological units is presented and discussed. The southern polar cap is rougher than the northern at kilometer and subkilometer scale, which suggests differences in the sublimation/condensation balance. The Vastitas Borealis Formation has a distinctive 3‐km‐scale background surface topography, which suggests a nonvolcanic origin for its upper layer. Young volcanic plains in Amazonis Planitia and the eastern part of Elysium Planitia are very similar to each other in their roughness characteristics and differ from other volcanic plains on Mars, which suggests a distinctive eruption style. There are systematic latitudinal variations of roughness in both the southern highlands and the northern lowlands: terrains at high latitude are smoother at short baselines; the characteristic vertical scale related to this difference is several meters. Processes that could be responsible for formation of this trend include creep of ice‐rich near‐surface material at high latitudes, treatment of the surface with repetitive deposition and sublimation of seasonal frost, climate‐controlled deposition and/or cementation of dust at high latitudes, and repetitive sublimation and accumulation of subsurface ice at low latitudes with climate variations. All mechanisms of origin could operate more effectively under different climate conditions. Relevant morphological observations favor mechanisms involving deposition of smooth blankets at high latitudes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000je001259

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 372

Metadata

Authors
Kreslavsky, M. A., & Head, J. W.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Published
2000-11
Volume
105
Issue
E11
Pages
26695-26711
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082197764
Cited by
372
References
1
FWCI
8.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kilometer‐scale roughness of Mars: Results from MOLA data analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000je001259
The paper
Kreslavsky, M. A., & Head, J. W. (2000). Kilometer‐scale roughness of Mars: Results from MOLA data analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000je001259

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.