Cited by 518Planetary Science and ExplorationAstro and Planetary ScienceSatellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry

Initial observations from the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA)

Open access
Smith, David E., Zuber, Maria T., Neumann, Gregory A., Lemoine, Frank G., Mazarico, Erwan, Torrence, Mark H., McGarry, Jan F., Rowlands, David D. +12 more·2010·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

As of June 19, 2010, the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter, an instrument on the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, has collected over 2.0 × 10 9 measurements of elevation that collectively represent the highest resolution global model of lunar topography yet produced. These altimetric observations have been used to improve the lunar geodetic grid to ∼10 m radial and ∼100 m spatial accuracy with respect to the Moon's center of mass. LOLA has also provided the highest resolution global maps yet produced of slopes, roughness and the 1064‐nm reflectance of the lunar surface. Regional topography of the lunar polar regions allows precise characterization of present and past illumination conditions. LOLA's initial global data sets as well as the first high‐resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) of polar topography are described herein.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2010gl043751

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, D. E., Zuber, M. T., Neumann, G. A., Lemoine, F. G., Mazarico, E., Torrence, M. H., McGarry, J. F., Rowlands, D. D., Head, J. W., Duxbury, T. H., Aharonson, O., Lucey, P. G., Robinson, M. S., Barnouin, O. S., Cavanaugh, J. F., Sun, X., Liiva, P., Mao, D., Smith, J. C., & Bartels, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies (United States) (US)
  • Department of Geological Sciences Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA
  • George Mason University (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US)
  • Sigma Space (United States) (US)
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2010-09
Volume
37
Issue
18
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W1489335540
Cited by
518
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 36
FWCI
14.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
Keywords
Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter, Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, lunar topography, digital elevation model, lunar polar regions, lunar surface reflectance, lunar surface roughness, lighting conditions, lunar gravity field

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review