Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 376

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Lunar rotational dissipation in solid body and molten core

Open access
Williams, James G., Boggs, Dale H., Yoder, Charles F., Ratcliff, J. Todd, Dickey, Jean O.·2001·Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets

Abstract

Analyses of Lunar Laser ranges show a displacement in direction of the Moon's pole of rotation which indicates that strong dissipation is acting on the rotation. Two possible sources of dissipation are monthly solid‐body tides raised by the Earth (and Sun) and a fluid core with a rotation distinct from the solid body. Both effects have been introduced into a numerical integration of the lunar rotation. Theoretical consequences of tides and core on rotation and orbit are also calculated analytically. These computations indicate that the tide and core dissipation signatures are separable. They also allow unrestricted laws for tidal specific dissipation Q versus frequency to be applied. Fits of Lunar Laser ranges detect three small dissipation terms in addition to the dominant pole‐displacement term. Tidal dissipation alone does not give a good match to all four amplitudes. Dissipation from tides plus fluid core accounts for them. The best match indicates a tidal Q which increases slowly with period plus a small fluid core. The core size depends on imperfectly known properties of the fluid and core‐mantle interface. The radius of a core could be as much as 352 km if iron and 374 km for the Fe‐FeS eutectic composition. If tidal Q versus frequency is assumed to be represented by a power law, then the exponent is −0.19±0.13. The monthly tidal Q is 37 (−4,+6), and the annual Q is 60 (−15,+30). The power presently dissipated by solid body and core is small, but it may have been dramatic for the early Moon. The outwardly evolving Moon passed through a change of spin state which caused a burst of dissipated power in the mantle and at the core‐mantle boundary. The energy deposited at the boundary plausibly drove convection in the core and temporarily powered a dynamo. The remanent magnetism in lunar rocks may result from these events, and the peak field may mark the passage of the Moon through the spin transition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000je001396

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 376

Metadata

Authors
Williams, J. G., Boggs, D. H., Yoder, C. F., Ratcliff, J. T., & Dickey, J. O.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Published
2001-11
Volume
106
Issue
E11
Pages
27933-27968
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967604670
Cited by
376
References
0
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lunar rotational dissipation in solid body and molten core. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000je001396
The paper
Williams, J. G., Boggs, D. H., Yoder, C. F., Ratcliff, J. T., & Dickey, J. O. (2001). Lunar rotational dissipation in solid body and molten core. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000je001396

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.