The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lunar Mare Soils: Space weathering and the major effects of surface‐correlated nanophase Fe
Open accessAbstract
Lunar soils form the “ground truth” for calibration and modeling of reflectance spectra for quantitative remote sensing. The Lunar Soil Characterization Consortium, a group of lunar sample and remote sensing scientists, has undertaken the extensive task of characterization of lunar soils, with respect to their mineralogical and chemical makeup. This endeavor is aimed at deciphering the effects of space weathering of soils from the Moon, and these results should apply to other airless bodies. Modal abundances and chemistries of minerals and glasses in the <45 μm size fractions of nine selected mare soils have been determined, along with the bulk chemistry of each size fraction, and their I S/FeO values. These data can be addressed at http:/web.utk.edu/∼pgi/data.html. As grain size decreases, the bulk composition of each size fraction continuously changes and approaches the composition of the agglutinitic glasses. Past dogma had it that the majority of the nanophase Fe 0 resides in the agglutinitic glasses. However, as grain size of a soil decreases, the percentage of the total iron present as nanophase‐sized Fe 0 increases dramatically, while the agglutinitic glass content rises only slightly. This is evidence for a large contribution to the I S/FeO values from surface‐correlated nanophase Fe 0, particularly in the <10 μm size fraction. This surficial nanophase Fe 0 is present largely as vapor‐deposited patinas on the surfaces of almost every particle of the mature soils. It is proposed that these vapor‐deposited, nanophase Fe 0‐bearing patinas may have far greater effects upon reflectance spectra of mare soils than the agglutinitic Fe 0.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Characteristics of the lunar samples returned by the Chang’E-5 mission
Li, C., Hu, H., Yang, M.-F., Pei, Z.-Y., Zhou, Q., Ren, X., Liu, B., Liu, D., Zeng, X., Zhang, G., et al. (2022) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwab188 · Cited by 494
Lunar surface: Dust dynamics and regolith mechanics
Colwell, J. E., Batiste, S., Horányi, M., Robertson, S., & Sture, S. (2007) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2005rg000184 · Cited by 437
Understanding the Lunar Surface and Space-Moon Interactions
Lucey, P. (2006) · Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · doi:10.2138/rmg.2006.60.2 · Cited by 434
Optical measurements of the Moon as a tool to study its surface
Shkuratov, Y., Kaydash, V., Korokhin, V., Velikodsky, Y., Opanasenko, N., & Videen, G. (2011) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2011.06.011 · Cited by 279
Evaluations of lunar regolith simulants
Taylor, L. A., Pieters, C. M., & Britt, D. (2016) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2016.04.005 · Cited by 183
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, L. A., Pieters, C. M., Keller, L. P., Morris, R. V., & McKay, D. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- E11
- Pages
- 27985-27999
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164761392
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lunar Mare Soils: Space weathering and the major effects of surface‐correlated nanophase Fe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000je001402
- The paper
- Taylor, L. A., Pieters, C. M., Keller, L. P., Morris, R. V., & McKay, D. S. (2001). Lunar Mare Soils: Space weathering and the major effects of surface‐correlated nanophase Fe. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000je001402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.