Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 293

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent gullies on Mars and the source of liquid water

Open access
Mellon, Michael T., Phillips, Roger J.·2001·Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets

Abstract

Geologic features resembling terrestrial water‐carved gullies imply that liquid water has flowed recently on the surface of Mars and challenge our views of the present‐day low‐temperature environment. We evaluate two possible mechanisms for the formation of liquid water under environmental conditions that we expect to have existed on Mars in its recent past. First, we examine the stability of ground ice in the permafrost and the potential for melting near‐surface ground ice (in the top few meters of soil) by solar heating and subsurface conduction. Second, we examine the potential for melting and refreezing of ice at shallow depths due to geothermal heating. We find that near‐surface ground ice does not reach the melting point of water under a range of conditions of soil thermophysical properties, latitudes, obliquities, and surface slopes. The atmosphere remains too dry for the ground ice to melt, even at high obliquity; instead, ice sublimates before reaching melting temperatures. However, the presence of salts in concentrations of 15–40% can adequately lower the melting point to allow melting to occur. We also find that a combination of a global average geothermal heat flux and a thick, low‐conductivity, unconsolidated regolith raises the depth of the melting isotherm to less than a few hundred meters from the surface. Orbitally induced oscillations in the mean annual surface temperature can cause freezing cycles in a confined aquifer at this depth. Freezing pressures generated are adequate to fracture ice‐cemented ground and allow water to escape to the surface, similar to the formation and evolution of terrestrial pingos in shallow permafrost. Both mechanisms are possible; however, the geothermal mechanism is consistent with the observations of the distribution of gullies, while the salty near‐surface ground ice mechanism is not. Further observational tests that can be performed with existing and future spacecraft are suggested.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000je001424

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 293

Metadata

Authors
Mellon, M. T., & Phillips, R. J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Published
2001-10
Volume
106
Issue
E10
Pages
23165-23179
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085819344
Cited by
293
References
3
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent gullies on Mars and the source of liquid water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2000je001424
The paper
Mellon, M. T., & Phillips, R. J. (2001). Recent gullies on Mars and the source of liquid water. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000je001424

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.