Cited by 635Hydrology and Watershed Management StudiesClimate variability and modelsHydrology and Drought Analysis

Climate elasticity of streamflow in the United States

Sankarasubramanian, A., Vogel, Richard M., Limbrunner, James F.·2001·Water Resources Research

Abstract

Precipitation elasticity of streamflow, ϵ P , provides a measure of the sensitivity of streamflow to changes in rainfall. Watershed model‐based estimates of ϵ P are shown to be highly sensitive to model structure and calibration error. A Monte Carlo experiment compares a nonparametric estimator of ϵ P with various watershed model‐based approaches. The nonparametric estimator is found to have low bias and is as robust as or more robust than alternate model‐based approaches. The nonparametric estimator is used to construct a map of ϵ P for the United States. Comparisons with 10 detailed climate change studies reveal that the contour map of ϵ P introduced here provides a validation metric for past and future climate change investigations in the United States. Further investigations reveal that ϵ P tends to be low for basins with significant snow accumulation and for basins whose moisture and energy inputs are seasonally in phase with one another. The Budyko hypothesis can only explain variations in ϵ P for very humid basins.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2000wr900330

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Climate elasticity models are especially suited for attributing river flow disturbance and are commonly applied for this purpose.

    “Climate elasticity models (CEMs) are especially suited for this purpose and commonly applied in the attribution of river flow disturbance12,55.”

    From Burned forests impact water supplies (2018) · cites this paper as [55]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sankarasubramanian, A., Vogel, R. M., & Limbrunner, J. F.
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
2001-06
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
1771-1781
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W2000618668
Cited by
635
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 34
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Water Resources Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Keywords
model structure sensitivity, snow accumulation, Budyko hypothesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review