The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Planktic foraminiferal sedimentation and the marine calcite budget
Abstract
The vertical flux and sedimentation rate of planktic foraminiferal tests are quantified and a global planktic foraminiferal CaCO 3 budget is presented. Test and calcite flux rates are calculated according to the distribution of species obtained from multinet and sediment trap samples. Modern planktic foraminiferal population dynamics are discussed as a prerequisite for the quantification of the calcite budget, highlighting the importance of ecological, autecological (e.g., reproduction), and biogeochemical conditions that determine the presence or absence of species. To complete the open‐marine, particulate CaCO 3 inventory, the contribution of coccolithophores, pteropods, and calcareous dinophytes is discussed. Based on the studied regions, the global planktic foraminiferal calcite flux rate at 100 m depth amounts to 1.3–3.2 Gt yr−1, equivalent to 23–56% of the total open marine CaCO 3 flux. The preservation of tests varies on a regional and temporal scale, and is affected by local hydrography and dissolution. During most of the year (off‐peak periods), many tests dissolve above 700‐m water depth while settling through the water column, with on average only 1–3% of the initially exported CaCO 3 reaching the deep‐seafloor. Pulsed flux events, mass dumps of fast settling particles, yield a major contribution of tests to the formation of deep‐sea sediments. On average, ∼25% of the initially produced planktic foraminiferal test CaCO 3 settles on the seafloor. The total planktic foraminiferal contribution of CaCO 3 to global surface sediments amounts to 0.36–0.88 Gt yr−1, ∼32–80% of the total deep‐marine calcite budget.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antoine, D., André, J., & Morel, A. (1996) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/95gb02832 · Cited by 911
Cited by
Impacts of ocean acidification on marine fauna and ecosystem processes
Fabry, V. J., Seibel, B. A., Feely, R. A., & Orr, J. C. (2008) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsn048 · Cited by 2,041
The role of the global carbonate cycle in the regulation and evolution of the Earth system
RIDGWELL, A., & ZEEBE, R. (2005) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2005.03.006 · Cited by 705
Erez, J. (2003) · Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · doi:10.2113/0540115 · Cited by 555
Ridgwell, A., Hargreaves, J. C., Edwards, N. R., Annan, J. D., Lenton, T. M., Marsh, R., Yool, A., & Watson, A. (2007) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-4-87-2007 · Cited by 295
Contribution of Fish to the Marine Inorganic Carbon Cycle
Wilson, R. W., Millero, F. J., Taylor, J. R., Walsh, P. J., Christensen, V., Jennings, S., & Grosell, M. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1157972 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Schiebel, R.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2002-10-24
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W1871116690
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Planktic foraminiferal sedimentation and the marine calcite budget. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001gb001459
- The paper
- Schiebel, R. (2002). Planktic foraminiferal sedimentation and the marine calcite budget. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gb001459
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.