Cited by 911Marine and coastal ecosystemsOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Oceanic primary production: 2. Estimation at global scale from satellite (Coastal Zone Color Scanner) chlorophyll

Antoine, David, André, Jean‐Michel, Morel, André·1996·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

A fast method has been proposed [ Antoine and Morel , this issue] to compute the oceanic primary production from the upper ocean chlorophyll‐like pigment concentration, as it can be routinely detected by a spaceborne ocean color sensor. This method is applied here to the monthly global maps of the photosynthetic pigments that were derived from the coastal zone color scanner (CZCS) data archive [ Feldman et al. , 1989]. The photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) field is computed from the astronomical constant and by using an atmospheric model, thereafter combined with averaged cloud information, derived from the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP). The aim is to assess the seasonal evolution, as well as the spatial distribution of the photosynthetic carbon fixation within the world ocean and for a “climatological year”, to the extent that both the chlorophyll information and the cloud coverage statistics actually are averages obtained over several years. The computed global annual production actually ranges between 36.5 and 45.6 Gt C yr −1 according to the assumption which is made (0.8 or 1) about the ratio of active‐to‐total pigments (recall that chlorophyll and pheopigments are not radiometrically resolved by CZCS). The relative contributions to the global productivity of the various oceans and zonal belts are examined. By considering the hypotheses needed in such computations, the nature of the data used as inputs, and the results of the sensitivit…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/95gb02832

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In LBc, the total primary production is estimated to 64.7 GtC yr−1, which is near the upper limit of previous estimates.

    “In LBc, the total primary production is estimated to 64.7 GtC yr−1, which is near the upper limit of previous estimates [Martin et al., 1987; Antoine et al., 1996].”

    From Potential impact of climate change on marine export production (2001) · cites this paper as Antoine et al., 1996

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antoine, D., André, J., & Morel, A.
Affiliations
Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie (FR)
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
1996-03
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
57-69
ISSN
  • 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9224
OpenAlex
W2064402331
Cited by
911
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 23
FWCI
20.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Goddard Space Flight Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
ocean primary productivity, chlorophyll, Coastal Zone Color Scanner, ocean color remote sensing, photosynthetic carbon fixation, photosynthetically active radiation, cloud cover, phaeopigments, seasonal evolution, ocean biogeochemistry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review