The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biogeochemical constraints on the Triassic‐Jurassic boundary carbon cycle event
Abstract
The end‐Triassic mass extinctions represent one of the five most severe biotic crises in Earth history, yet remain one of the most enigmatic. Ongoing debate concerns the environmental effects of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP) eruptions and their linkage with the mass extinction event across the Triassic‐Jurassic boundary. There is conflicting paleo‐evidence for changes in atmospheric p CO 2 during the extrusion of the CAMP basalts. Studies on sediments from European and Pacific localities have, however, identified a substantial negative isotopic anomaly (up to −3.5‰) across the TR‐J boundary, providing an important indicator of changes in the operation of the ancient global carbon cycle. We sought to explain the paleo‐evidence by utilizing a carbon cycle model for the “hothouse” world of the end‐Triassic that emphasizes the chemical weathering of silicate and carbonate rocks and the ocean carbonate chemistry. We find that volcanic CO 2 outgassing fails to fully account for either a sufficient rise in atmospheric p CO 2(indicated by the stomata of fossil leaves) or the sedimentary isotopic fingerprint. Instead, the scenario that best fits all of the geologic evidence is a positive feedback loop in which warming, due to a buildup of volcanically derived CO 2, triggers destabilization of seafloor methane hydrates and the catastrophic release of CH 4[Pálfy et al., 2001]. We calculate that this carbon cycle perturbation was huge, involving the release of ∼8000–9000 Gt C as CO 2 during the CAMP basaltic eruptions and ∼5000 Gt C as CH 4. In the model the initial isotopic excursion is assumed to take place over ∼70 kyr, while complete reequilibration of the ocean‐atmosphere system with respect to CO 2 is accomplished over 700–1000 kyr. Our results thus provide a preliminary theoretical explanation for the bioevents, estimated p CO 2 changes, and isotopic excursions observed in marine and continental sediments at this time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berner, R. A., Lasaga, A. C., & Garrels, R. M. (1983) · American Journal of Science · doi:10.2475/ajs.283.7.641 · Cited by 2,428 · cited 1×
“] to develop a revised set of CO2 curves. We next adopt a model-based approach to quantify the effect of mantle CO2 outgassing during the emplacement of the CAMP basalts on atmospheric CO2 levels and the carbon isotopic composition of the organic and inorganic carbon reservoirs. Our model, which accounts for the chemi…”
MethodSelf-citationGEOCARB III: A revised model of atmospheric CO2 over Phanerozoic time
Berner, R. A. (2001) · American Journal of Science · doi:10.2475/ajs.301.2.182 · Cited by 1,323
Self-citationInterpreting carbon-isotope excursions: carbonates and organic matter
Kump, L. R., & Arthur, M. A. (1999) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/s0009-2541(99)00086-8 · Cited by 1,171
Cited by
Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH
Caldeira, K., & Wickett, M. E. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/425365a · Cited by 3,549
Saltzman, M. R., & Thomas, E. (2012) · The Geologic Time Scale · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-59425-9.00011-1 · Cited by 436
Self, S., Widdowson, M., Thordarson, T., & Jay, A. E. (2006) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2006.05.041 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Beerling, D. J., & Berner, R. A.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2002-07-18
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W1617554277
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biogeochemical constraints on the Triassic‐Jurassic boundary carbon cycle event. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001gb001637
- The paper
- Beerling, D. J., & Berner, R. A. (2002). Biogeochemical constraints on the Triassic‐Jurassic boundary carbon cycle event. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gb001637
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.