Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 212

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biogeochemical constraints on the Triassic‐Jurassic boundary carbon cycle event

Beerling, D. J., Berner, R. A.·2002·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

The end‐Triassic mass extinctions represent one of the five most severe biotic crises in Earth history, yet remain one of the most enigmatic. Ongoing debate concerns the environmental effects of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP) eruptions and their linkage with the mass extinction event across the Triassic‐Jurassic boundary. There is conflicting paleo‐evidence for changes in atmospheric p CO 2 during the extrusion of the CAMP basalts. Studies on sediments from European and Pacific localities have, however, identified a substantial negative isotopic anomaly (up to −3.5‰) across the TR‐J boundary, providing an important indicator of changes in the operation of the ancient global carbon cycle. We sought to explain the paleo‐evidence by utilizing a carbon cycle model for the “hothouse” world of the end‐Triassic that emphasizes the chemical weathering of silicate and carbonate rocks and the ocean carbonate chemistry. We find that volcanic CO 2 outgassing fails to fully account for either a sufficient rise in atmospheric p CO 2(indicated by the stomata of fossil leaves) or the sedimentary isotopic fingerprint. Instead, the scenario that best fits all of the geologic evidence is a positive feedback loop in which warming, due to a buildup of volcanically derived CO 2, triggers destabilization of seafloor methane hydrates and the catastrophic release of CH 4[Pálfy et al., 2001]. We calculate that this carbon cycle perturbation was huge, involving the release of ∼8000–9000 Gt C as CO 2 during the CAMP basaltic eruptions and ∼5000 Gt C as CH 4. In the model the initial isotopic excursion is assumed to take place over ∼70 kyr, while complete reequilibration of the ocean‐atmosphere system with respect to CO 2 is accomplished over 700–1000 kyr. Our results thus provide a preliminary theoretical explanation for the bioevents, estimated p CO 2 changes, and isotopic excursions observed in marine and continental sediments at this time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2001gb001637

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 212

Metadata

Authors
Beerling, D. J., & Berner, R. A.
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
2002-07-18
Volume
16
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9224
OpenAlex
W1617554277
Cited by
212
References
3
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biogeochemical constraints on the Triassic‐Jurassic boundary carbon cycle event. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001gb001637
The paper
Beerling, D. J., & Berner, R. A. (2002). Biogeochemical constraints on the Triassic‐Jurassic boundary carbon cycle event. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gb001637

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.