Cited by 1,354Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesMagnetic Properties and Synthesis of FerritesMagnetic Properties of Alloys

Theory and application of the Day plot ( M rs / M s versus H cr / H c ) 1. Theoretical curves and tests using titanomagnetite data

Dunlop, David J.·2002·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

Although most paleomagnetic and environmental magnetic papers incorporate a Day plot of the hysteresis parameters M rs / M s versus H cr / H c , a comprehensive theory covering superparamagnetic (SP), single‐domain (SD), pseudo‐single‐domain (PSD), and multidomain (MD) (titano)magnetites is lacking. There is no consensus on how to quantify grain‐size trends within the Day plot, how to distinguish MD from SP trends/mixtures, or whether magnetite, titanomagnetites, and other minerals have distinctive trends by which they might be identified. This paper develops the theory of the Day plot parameters for MD, MD + SD, PSD, and SP + SD grains of titanomagnetite (Fe 3 – x Ti x O 4 ) with compositions x = 0 (TM0 or magnetite) and x = 0.6 (TM60). MD grains have a separate trend that intersects the curve for SD + MD mixtures. SP + SD mixtures generate a variety of trends, depending on the SP grain size. All SP + SD curves lie much above those for MD or SD + MD trends, as has been proposed, but not demonstrated, previously. Data for PSD‐size magnetites of many different origins fall along a single trend, but different levels of internal stress shift points for similar grain sizes along the “master curve.” In order to use the Day plot to determine grain size, one must have independent information about the state of internal stress. Theoretical model curves for SD + MD mixtures match the PSD magnetite and TM60 data quite well, although the SD→MD transition region in grain size is much narrower for TM60 than for magnetite. The agreement between PSD data and SD + MD mixing curves implies that PSD behavior is due to superimposed independent SD and MD moments, either in individual or separate grains, and not to exotic micromagnetic structures such as vortices. The theory also matches M rs and H c values in mechanical mixtures of very fine and very coarse grains, although nonlinear mixing theory is required to explain some H cr and H cr / H c data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2001jb000486

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunlop, D. J.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Dunlop, David J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
2002-03
Volume
107
Issue
B3
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144031821
Cited by
1,354
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 108 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 80 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 69
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Magnetic Properties of Alloys
Keywords
titanomagnetite, magnetite, superparamagnetism, single-domain grains, pseudo-single-domain grains, multidomain grains, grain size, internal stress, coercivity, remanent magnetization, magnetic hysteresis, micromagnetic structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review