The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modeling the formation of secondary organic aerosol within a comprehensive air quality model system
Open accessAbstract
The Secondary Organic Aerosol Model (SORGAM) has been developed for use in comprehensive air quality model systems. Coupled to a chemistry‐transport model, SORGAM is capable of simulating secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation including the production of low‐volatility products and their subsequent gas/particle partitioning. The current model formulation assumes that all SOA compounds interact and form a quasi‐ideal solution. This has significant impact on the gas/particle partitioning, since in this case the saturation concentrations of the SOA compounds depend on the composition of the SOA and the amount of absorbing material present. Box model simulations have been performed to investigate the sensitivity of the model against several parameters. Results clearly show the importance of the temperature dependence of saturation concentrations on the partitioning process. Furthermore, SORGAM has been coupled to the comprehensive European Air Pollution and Dispersion/Modal Aerosol Dynamics Model for Europe air quality model system, and results of a three‐dimensional model application are presented. The model results indicate that assuming interacting SOA compounds, biogenic and anthropogenic contributions significantly influence each other and cannot be treated independently.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Organic aerosol and global climate modelling: a review
Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F. J., Facchini, M. C., Van Dingenen, R., Ervens, B., Nenes, A., Nielsen, C. J., et al. (2005) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005 · Cited by 3,244
Fast, J. D., Gustafson, W. I., Easter, R. C., Zaveri, R. A., Barnard, J. C., Chapman, E. G., Grell, G. A., & Peckham, S. E. (2006) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd006721 · Cited by 1,162
Vehkamäki, H., Kulmala, M., Napari, I., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Timmreck, C., Noppel, M., & Laaksonen, A. (2002) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2002jd002184 · Cited by 663
Gelencsér, A., May, B., Simpson, D., Sánchez‐Ochoa, A., Kasper‐Giebl, A., Puxbaum, H., Caseiro, A., Pio, C., & Legrand, M. (2007) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2006jd008094 · Cited by 530
Online coupled regional meteorology chemistry models in Europe: current status and prospects
Baklanov, A., Schlünzen, K., Suppan, P., Baldasano, J., Brunner, D., Aksoyoglu, S., Carmichael, G., Douros, J., Flemming, J., Forkel, R., et al. (2014) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-14-317-2014 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Schell, B., Ackermann, I. J., Hass, H., Binkowski, F. S., & Ebel, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- D22
- Pages
- 28275-28293
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979659508
- Cited by
- 855
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling the formation of secondary organic aerosol within a comprehensive air quality model system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001jd000384
- The paper
- Schell, B., Ackermann, I. J., Hass, H., Binkowski, F. S., & Ebel, A. (2001). Modeling the formation of secondary organic aerosol within a comprehensive air quality model system. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd000384
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.