The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of smoke impact on clouds in Brazilian biomass burning regions: An extension of Twomey's approach
Abstract
Satellite remote sensing of smoke aerosol‐cloud interaction during the recent Smoke, Clouds, and Radiation‐Brazil (SCAR‐B) experiment is analyzed to explore the factors that determine the magnitude of the cloud response to smoke aerosol. Analysis of 2 years worth of data revealed that the response is greatest in the north of Brazil where aerosol optical depth is smallest, and tends to decrease as one moves southward, and as aerosol optical depth increases. Saturation in this response occurs at an aerosol optical depth of 0.8 in 1987 and 0.4 in 1995. To explore the reasons for this, a framework is developed in which the satellite‐measured response can be compared to simple analytical models of this response and to numerical models of smoke aerosol‐cloud interaction. Three types of response are identified: (1) cloud droplet concentrations increase with increasing aerosol loading, followed by saturation in the response at high concentrations; (2) as in type 1, followed by increasing droplet concentrations with further increases in aerosol loading. This increase in droplet concentration is due to the suppression of supersaturation by abundant large particles, which prevents the activation of smaller particles. This enables renewed activation of larger particles when smoke loadings exceed some threshold; (3) as in type 1, followed by a decrease in droplet number concentrations with increasing aerosol loading as intense competition for vapor evaporates the smaller droplets. The latter implies an unexpected increase in drop size with increasing smoke loading. The conditions under which each of these responses are expected to occur are discussed. It is shown that although to first‐order smoke optical depth is a good proxy for aerosol indirect forcing, under some conditions the size distribution and hygroscopicity can be important factors. We find no evidence that indirect forcing depends on precipitable water vapor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness
Albrecht, B. A. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.245.4923.1227 · Cited by 4,422
Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate
Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O., & Warren, S. G. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/326655a0 · Cited by 4,305
Cited by
Reid, J. S., Eck, T. F., Christopher, S. A., Koppmann, R., Dubovik, O., Eleuterio, D. P., Holben, B. N., Reid, E. A., & Zhang, J. (2005) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-5-827-2005 · Cited by 1,158
Measurement of the Effect of Amazon Smoke on Inhibition of Cloud Formation
Koren, I., Kaufman, Y. J., Remer, L. A., & Martins, J. V. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089424 · Cited by 722
Self-citationThe effect of physical and chemical aerosol properties on warm cloud droplet activation
McFiggans, G., Artaxo, P., Baltensperger, U., Coe, H., Facchini, M. C., Feingold, G., Fuzzi, S., Gysel, M., Laaksonen, A., Lohmann, U., et al. (2006) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-6-2593-2006 · Cited by 710
Self-citationSmoke Invigoration Versus Inhibition of Clouds over the Amazon
Koren, I., Martins, J. V., Remer, L. A., & Afargan, H. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159185 · Cited by 454
Self-citationAerosol Effect on Cloud Droplet Size Monitored from Satellite
Bréon, F.-M., Tanré, D., & Generoso, S. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066434 · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- Feingold, G., Remer, L. A., Ramaprasad, J., & Kaufman, Y. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- D19
- Pages
- 22907-22922
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080354714
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of smoke impact on clouds in Brazilian biomass burning regions: An extension of Twomey's approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001jd000732
- The paper
- Feingold, G., Remer, L. A., Ramaprasad, J., & Kaufman, Y. J. (2001). Analysis of smoke impact on clouds in Brazilian biomass burning regions: An extension of Twomey's approach. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd000732
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.