The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Radiative effects of aerosols on the evolution of the atmospheric boundary layer
Abstract
This study investigates the impacts of tropospheric aerosols on the evolution of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) for dry subsiding regions by conducting simulations with a high‐resolution ABL model. The scattering and absorption of aerosols diminish the surface radiation, inhibiting the sensible heat flux and evaporation and inducing feedbacks such as the enhanced stratification and change in relative humidity in the surface layer. The reduced sensible heat due to aerosol backscattering lowers the air temperature and suppresses the growth of the ABL. The resultant reduction of entrainment heating contributes to an additional cooling. The decreased entrainment drying competes with the reduced surface evaporation, so that the net effect can be either an increase or a decrease of the ABL moisture, depending on the soil moisture. Aerosol absorption decreases the turbulent heating but simultaneously increases the solar heating, increasing the air temperature and decreasing the strength of capping inversion. The resultant rise of the top of the ABL compensates the lowering due to the reduced buoyancy flux. With strong aerosol absorption, the increased entrainment heating enhances the ABL warming. Both the increased entrainment drying and the reduced evaporation decrease the ABL moisture. The increased warmth and dryness of the ABL imply that absorbing aerosols within the ABL decrease the probability of formation of boundary layer clouds, causing additional warming through cloud‐feedbacks. The results are sensitive to the vertical distribution of absorbing aerosols. Absorbing aerosol above the ABL increases the strength of capping inversion and reduces the top of the ABL, hence decreasing the entrainment drying and moistening the ABL.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness
Albrecht, B. A. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.245.4923.1227 · Cited by 4,422
Radiative forcing and climate response
Hansen, J., Sato, M., & Ruedy, R. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/96jd03436 · Cited by 2,241
Cited by
Severe haze in northern China: A synergy of anthropogenic emissions and atmospheric processes
An, Z., Huang, R.-J., Zhang, R., Tie, X., Li, G., Cao, J., Zhou, W., Shi, Z., Han, Y., Gu, Z., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1900125116 · Cited by 1,015
Enhanced haze pollution by black carbon in megacities in China
Ding, A. J., Huang, X., Nie, W., Sun, J. N., Kerminen, V. ‐., Petäjä, T., Su, H., Cheng, Y. F., Yang, X. ‐., Wang, M. H., et al. (2016) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2016gl067745 · Cited by 895
Measurement of the Effect of Amazon Smoke on Inhibition of Cloud Formation
Koren, I., Kaufman, Y. J., Remer, L. A., & Martins, J. V. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089424 · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, H., Liu, S. C., & Dickinson, R. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2002-06-21
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- D12
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064097566
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiative effects of aerosols on the evolution of the atmospheric boundary layer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001jd000754
- The paper
- Yu, H., Liu, S. C., & Dickinson, R. E. (2002). Radiative effects of aerosols on the evolution of the atmospheric boundary layer. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd000754
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.