Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of aerosols on tropospheric oxidants: A global model study

Open access
Tie, Xuexi, Brasseur, Guy, Emmons, Louisa, Horowitz, Larry, Kinnison, Douglas·2001·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

The global distributions of sulfate and soot particles in the atmosphere are calculated, and the effect of aerosol particles on tropospheric oxidants is studied using a global chemical/transport/aerosol model. The model is developed in the framework of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) global three‐dimensional chemical/transport model (Model for Ozone and Related Chemical Tracers (MOZART)). In addition to the gas‐phase photochemistry implemented in the MOZART model, the present study also accounts for the formation of sulfate and black carbon aerosols as well as for heterogeneous reactions on particles. The simulated global sulfate aerosol distributions and seasonal variation are compared with observations. The seasonal variation of sulfate aerosols is in agreement with measurements, except in the Arctic region. The calculated vertical profiles of sulfate aerosol agree well with the observations over North America. In the case of black carbon the calculated surface distribution is in fair agreement with observations. The effects of aerosol formation and heterogeneous reactions on the surface of sulfate aerosols are studied. The model calculations show the following: (1) The concentration of H 2 O 2 is reduced when sulfate aerosols are formed due to the reaction of SO 2 + H 2 O 2 in cloud droplets. The gas‐phase reaction SO 2 + OH converts OH to HO 2, but the reduction of OH and enhancement of HO 2 are insignificant (<3%). (2) The heterogeneous reaction of HO 2 on the surface of sulfate aerosols produces up to 10% reduction of hydroperoxyl radical (HO 2) with an uptake coefficient of 0.2. However, this uptake coefficient could be overestimated, and the results should be regard as an upper limit estimation. (3) The N 2 O 5 reaction on the surface of sulfate aerosols leads to an 80% reduction of NO x at middle to high latitudes during winter. Because ozone production efficiency is low in winter, ozone decreases by only 10% as a result of this reaction. However, during summer the N 2 O 5 reaction reduces NO x by 15% and O 3 by 8–10% at middle to high latitudes. (4) The heterogeneous reaction of CH 2 O on sulfate aerosols with an upper limit uptake coefficient (γ = 0.01) leads to an 80 to 90% decrease in CH 2 O and 8 to 10% reduction of HO 2 at middle to high latitudes during winter. Many uncertainties remain in our understanding of heterogeneous chemical processes and in the estimate of kinetic parameters. This model study should therefore be regarded as exploratory and subject to further improvements before final conclusions can be made.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2001jd900206

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Tie, X., Brasseur, G., Emmons, L., Horowitz, L., & Kinnison, D.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2001-10
Volume
106
Issue
D19
Pages
22931-22964
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965473538
Cited by
182
References
0
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of aerosols on tropospheric oxidants: A global model study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001jd900206
The paper
Tie, X., Brasseur, G., Emmons, L., Horowitz, L., & Kinnison, D. (2001). Effects of aerosols on tropospheric oxidants: A global model study. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd900206

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.