The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM, version 2: sensitivity to improvements in process representations
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. This paper introduces and evaluates the second version of the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM. Major changes have been brought into the model, including new parameterizations for aerosol nucleation and water uptake, an explicit treatment of secondary organic aerosols, modified emission calculations for sea salt and mineral dust, the coupling of aerosol microphysics to a two-moment stratiform cloud microphysics scheme, and alternative wet scavenging parameterizations. These revisions extend the model's capability to represent details of the aerosol lifecycle and its interaction with climate. Nudged simulations of the year 2000 are carried out to compare the aerosol properties and global distribution in HAM1 and HAM2, and to evaluate them against various observations. Sensitivity experiments are performed to help identify the impact of each individual update in model formulation. Results indicate that from HAM1 to HAM2 there is a marked weakening of aerosol water uptake in the lower troposphere, reducing the total aerosol water burden from 75 Tg to 51 Tg. The main reason is the newly introduced κ-Köhler-theory-based water uptake scheme uses a lower value for the maximum relative humidity cutoff. Particulate organic matter loading in HAM2 is considerably higher in the upper troposphere, because the explicit treatment of secondary organic aerosols allows highly volatile oxidation products of the precursors to be vertically transported to regions of very low temperature and to form aerosols there. Sulfate, black carbon, particulate organic matter and mineral dust in HAM2 have longer lifetimes than in HAM1 because of weaker in-cloud scavenging, which is in turn related to lower autoconversion efficiency in the newly introduced two-moment cloud microphysics scheme. Modification in the sea salt emission scheme causes a significant increase in the ratio (from 1.6 to 7.7) between accumulation mode and coarse mode emission fluxes of aerosol number concentration. This leads to a general increase in the number concentration of smaller particles over the oceans in HAM2, as reflected by the higher Ångström parameters. Evaluation against observation reveals that in terms of model performance, main improvements in HAM2 include a marked decrease of the systematic negative bias in the absorption aerosol optical depth, as well as smaller biases over the oceans in Ångström parameter and in the accumulation mode number concentration. The simulated geographical distribution of aerosol optical depth (AOD) is better correlated with the MODIS data, while the surface aerosol mass concentrations are very similar to those in the old version. The total aerosol water content in HAM2 is considerably closer to the multi-model average from Phase I of the AeroCom intercomparison project. Model deficiencies that require further efforts in the future include (i) positive biases in AOD over the ocean, (ii) negative biases in AOD and aerosol mass concentration in high-latitude regions, and (iii) negative biases in particle number concentration, especially that of the Aitken mode, in the lower troposphere in heavily polluted regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change
Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., & Noone, K. (1998) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.882420 · Cited by 8,731
Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J., & Clough, S. A. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/97jd00237 · Cited by 8,419
Uppala, S. M., KÅllberg, P. W., Simmons, A. J., Andrae, U., Bechtold, V. D. C., Fiorino, M., Gibson, J. K., Haseler, J., Hernandez, A., Kelly, G. A., et al. (2005) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1256/qj.04.176 · Cited by 6,804
Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., & Geron, C. (2006) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006 · Cited by 4,603
A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissions
Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D., Fall, R., Geron, C., Graedel, T., Harley, P., Klinger, L., Lerdau, M., Mckay, W. A., et al. (1995) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/94jd02950 · Cited by 4,169
A Comprehensive Mass Flux Scheme for Cumulus Parameterization in Large-Scale Models
Tiedtke, M. (1989) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1779:acmfsf>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,648
Organic aerosol and global climate modelling: a review
Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F. J., Facchini, M. C., Van Dingenen, R., Ervens, B., Nenes, A., Nielsen, C. J., et al. (2005) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005 · Cited by 3,244
Light Absorption by Carbonaceous Particles: An Investigative Review
Bond, T. C., & Bergstrom, R. W. (2006) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786820500421521 · Cited by 2,980
Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software Package OPAC
Hess, M., Koepke, P., & Schult, I. (1998) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0831:opoaac>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,909
A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity
Petters, M. D., & Kreidenweis, S. M. (2007) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007 · Cited by 2,665
Cited by
Air Quality and Climate Connections
Fiore, A. M., Naik, V., & Leibensperger, E. M. (2015) · Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association · doi:10.1080/10962247.2015.1040526 · Cited by 537
Evaluating the climate and air quality impacts of short-lived pollutants
Stohl, A., Aamaas, B., Amann, M., Baker, L. H., Bellouin, N., Berntsen, T. K., Boucher, O., Cherian, R., Collins, W., Daskalakis, N., et al. (2015) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-15-10529-2015 · Cited by 455
Self-citationWhy cirrus cloud seeding cannot substantially cool the planet
Gasparini, B., & Lohmann, U. (2016) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/2015jd024666 · Cited by 146
Self-citationClimate and air quality trade-offs in altering ship fuel sulfur content
Partanen, A. I., Laakso, A., Schmidt, A., Kokkola, H., Kuokkanen, T., Pietikäinen, J.-P., Kerminen, V.-M., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laakso, L., & Korhonen, H. (2013) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-13-12059-2013 · Cited by 55
“We used AEROCOMII ACCMIP data for anthropogenic aerosol emissions and biomass burning emissions for the year 2010 (Riahi et al., 2007, 2011) and natural aerosol emissions as described by Zhang et al. (2012).”
InfluentialPeters, K., Stier, P., Quaas, J., & Graßl, H. (2012) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-12-5985-2012 · Cited by 38
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, K., O'Donnell, D., Kazil, J., Stier, P., Kinne, S., Lohmann, U., Ferrachat, S., Croft, B., Quaas, J., Wan, H., Rast, S., & Feichter, J.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2012-10-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 8911-8949
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W1999139360
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 116
- FWCI
- 18.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM, version 2: sensitivity to improvements in process representations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/acp-12-8911-2012
- The paper
- Zhang, K., O'Donnell, D., Kazil, J., Stier, P., Kinne, S., Lohmann, U., Ferrachat, S., Croft, B., Quaas, J., Wan, H., Rast, S., & Feichter, J. (2012). The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM, version 2: sensitivity to improvements in process representations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8911-2012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.