Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gross primary production and light response parameters of four Southern Plains ecosystems estimated using long‐term CO2‐flux tower measurements

Open access
Gilmanov, Tagir G., Verma, Shashi B., Sims, Phillip L., Meyers, Tilden P., Bradford, James A., Burba, George G., Suyker, Andrew E.·2003·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

Gross primary production (GPP) is one of the most important characteristics of an ecosystem. At present, no empirically based method to estimate GPP is available, other than measurements of net CO 2 exchange and calculations of respiration. Data sets from continuous CO 2 flux measurements in a number of ecosystems (Ameriflux, AgriFlux, etc.) for the first time provide an opportunity to obtain empirically based estimates of GPP. In this paper, using the results of CO 2 flux tower measurements during the 1997 season at four sites in Oklahoma (tallgrass prairie, mixed prairie, pasture, and winter wheat crop), we describe a method to evaluate the average daytime rate of ecosystem respiration, R d, by estimation of the respiration term of the nonrectangular hyperbolic model of the ecosystem‐scale light‐response curve. Comparison of these predicted daytime respiration rates with directly measured corresponding nighttime values, R n, after appropriate length of the night and temperature correction, demonstrated close linear relationship, with 0.82 ≤ R 2 ≤ 0.98 for weekly averaged fluxes. Daily gross primary productivity, P g, can be calculated as P g = P d + R d, where P d is the daytime integral of the net ecosystem CO 2 exchange, obtained directly from measurements. Annual GPP for the sites, obtained as the sum of P g over the whole period with P g > 0 were: tallgrass prairie, 5223 g CO 2 m−2; winter wheat, 2853 g CO 2 m−2; mixed prairie, 3037 g CO 2 m−2; and pasture, 2333 g CO 2 m−2. These values are in agreement with published GPP estimates for nonforest terrestrial ecosystems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2002gb002023

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Gilmanov, T. G., Verma, S. B., Sims, P. L., Meyers, T. P., Bradford, J. A., Burba, G. G., & Suyker, A. E.
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
2003-06
Volume
17
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9224
OpenAlex
W1489331011
Cited by
199
References
2
FWCI
9.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gross primary production and light response parameters of four Southern Plains ecosystems estimated using long‐term CO2‐flux tower measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2002gb002023
The paper
Gilmanov, T. G., Verma, S. B., Sims, P. L., Meyers, T. P., Bradford, J. A., Burba, G. G., & Suyker, A. E. (2003). Gross primary production and light response parameters of four Southern Plains ecosystems estimated using long‐term CO2‐flux tower measurements. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002gb002023

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.