The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gross primary production and light response parameters of four Southern Plains ecosystems estimated using long‐term CO2‐flux tower measurements
Open accessAbstract
Gross primary production (GPP) is one of the most important characteristics of an ecosystem. At present, no empirically based method to estimate GPP is available, other than measurements of net CO 2 exchange and calculations of respiration. Data sets from continuous CO 2 flux measurements in a number of ecosystems (Ameriflux, AgriFlux, etc.) for the first time provide an opportunity to obtain empirically based estimates of GPP. In this paper, using the results of CO 2 flux tower measurements during the 1997 season at four sites in Oklahoma (tallgrass prairie, mixed prairie, pasture, and winter wheat crop), we describe a method to evaluate the average daytime rate of ecosystem respiration, R d, by estimation of the respiration term of the nonrectangular hyperbolic model of the ecosystem‐scale light‐response curve. Comparison of these predicted daytime respiration rates with directly measured corresponding nighttime values, R n, after appropriate length of the night and temperature correction, demonstrated close linear relationship, with 0.82 ≤ R 2 ≤ 0.98 for weekly averaged fluxes. Daily gross primary productivity, P g, can be calculated as P g = P d + R d, where P d is the daytime integral of the net ecosystem CO 2 exchange, obtained directly from measurements. Annual GPP for the sites, obtained as the sum of P g over the whole period with P g > 0 were: tallgrass prairie, 5223 g CO 2 m−2; winter wheat, 2853 g CO 2 m−2; mixed prairie, 3037 g CO 2 m−2; and pasture, 2333 g CO 2 m−2. These values are in agreement with published GPP estimates for nonforest terrestrial ecosystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth
Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V. N., Underwood, E. C., D'amico, J. A., Itoua, I., Strand, H. E., Morrison, J. C., et al. (2001) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:teotwa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 8,488
Harvest index: a review of its use in plant breeding and crop physiology.
HAY, R. K. M. (1995) · Annals of Applied Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1995.tb05015.x · Cited by 686
Cited by
LASSLOP, G., REICHSTEIN, M., PAPALE, D., RICHARDSON, A. D., ARNETH, A., BARR, A., STOY, P., & WOHLFAHRT, G. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02041.x · Cited by 1,156
Baldocchi, D. (2008) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt07151 · Cited by 1,123
Gilmanov, T. G., Soussana, J. F., Aires, L., Allard, V., Ammann, C., Balzarolo, M., Barcza, Z., Bernhofer, C., Campbell, C. L., Cernusca, A., et al. (2007) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.008 · Cited by 357
Self-citationMeasurements necessary for assessing the net ecosystem carbon budget of croplands
Smith, P., Lanigan, G., Kutsch, W. L., Buchmann, N., Eugster, W., Aubinet, M., Ceschia, E., Béziat, P., Yeluripati, J. B., Osborne, B., et al. (2010) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2010.04.004 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilmanov, T. G., Verma, S. B., Sims, P. L., Meyers, T. P., Bradford, J. A., Burba, G. G., & Suyker, A. E.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W1489331011
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gross primary production and light response parameters of four Southern Plains ecosystems estimated using long‐term CO2‐flux tower measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2002gb002023
- The paper
- Gilmanov, T. G., Verma, S. B., Sims, P. L., Meyers, T. P., Bradford, J. A., Burba, G. G., & Suyker, A. E. (2003). Gross primary production and light response parameters of four Southern Plains ecosystems estimated using long‐term CO2‐flux tower measurements. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002gb002023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.