The ENSO effect on the tropical Atlantic variability: A regionally coupled model study
Abstract
A CGCM is used to study the relative roles played by local air‐sea interaction and remote ENSO effects on the tropical Atlantic interannual variability. A regional coupling strategy allows full air‐sea coupling only over the Atlantic Ocean north of 30°S. Two experiments were conducted, respectively with either climatological or real time boundary conditions prescribed over the uncoupled portion of the global domain. The simulations show that major anomalous SST modes in the tropical South Atlantic are mainly caused by coupled ocean‐atmosphere processes within the Atlantic sector. SST anomalies in the northern tropical ocean, however, are substantially affected by the Pacific ENSO, with local coupling accounting for an enhanced effect. The El Niño effect causes warmer SST in the northern tropical Atlantic in the boreal spring season, forced by weakened northeast trade winds over the Atlantic basin starting from boreal winter in the maturing El Niño phase. The warmer SST anomalies then trigger a positive air‐sea feedback within the Atlantic basin, which leads to stronger anomalous cross‐equatorial atmospheric flow in the spring season.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ENSO influence on the tropical Atlantic is strongest in the North Tropical Atlantic, with Atlantic warming occurring 4-5 months after the mature phases of Pacific warm events.
“Many observational (Enfield et al., 1997) and modeling (Huang et al., 2002) studies have shown that the ENSO influence on the tropical Atlantic is strongest in the North Tropical Atlantic, with Atlantic warming occurring 4-5 months after the mature phases of Pacific warm events (Xie and Carton, 2004).”
From Sea surface temperature patterns in the Tropical Atlantic: Principal component analysis and nonlinear principal component analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Huang et al., 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kucharski, F., Bracco, A., Yoo, J. H., & Molteni, F. (2007) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli4254.1 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
How are large western hemisphere warm pools formed?
Enfield, D. B., Lee, S.-K., & Wang, C. (2006) · Progress in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2005.07.006 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Kenfack, C. S., Mkankam, F. K., Alory, G., Penhoat, Y. D., Hounkonnou, M. N., Vondou, D. A., & Jr., B. G. N. (2017) · Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences · doi:10.3319/tao.2016.08.29.01 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huang, B., Schopf, P. S., & Pan, Z.
- Affiliations
- Center for Ocean‐Land‐Atmosphere Studies Calverton Maryland USA
- ORCID
- Huang, Bohua
- Venue
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 21
- ISSN
- 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8007
- OpenAlex
- W2079344024
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- ENSO, ocean-atmosphere interaction, sea surface temperature anomalies, El Niño, northeast trade winds, air-sea feedback, tropical South Atlantic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review