Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 425

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatio‐temporal structure of storm‐time chorus

Open access
Santolík, O., Gurnett, D. A., Pickett, J. S., Parrot, M., Cornilleau‐Wehrlin, N.·2003·Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Abstract

We discuss chorus emissions measured by the four Cluster spacecraft at close separations during a geomagnetically disturbed period on 18 April 2002. We analyze the lower band of chorus below one half of the electron cyclotron frequency, measured at a radial distance of 4.4 Earth's radii, within a 2000 km long source region located close to the equator. The characteristic wave vector directions in this region are nearly parallel to the field lines and the multipoint measurement demonstrates the dynamic character of the chorus source region, changing the Poynting flux direction at time scales shorter than a few seconds. The electric field waveforms of the chorus wave packets (forming separate chorus elements on power spectrograms) show a fine structure consisting of subpackets with a maximum amplitude above 30 mV/m. To study this fine structure we have used a sine‐wave parametric model with a variable amplitude. The subpackets typically start with an exponential growth phase, and after reaching the saturation amplitude they often show an exponential decay phase. The duration of subpackets is variable from a few milliseconds to a few tens of milliseconds, and they appear in the waveform randomly, with no clear periodicity. The obtained growth rate (ratio of the imaginary part to the real part of the wave frequency) is highly variable from case to case with values obtained between a few thousandths and a few hundredths. The same chorus wave packets simultaneously observed on the different closely separated spacecraft appear to have a different internal subpacket structure. The characteristic scale of the subpackets can thus be lower than tens of kilometers in the plane perpendicular to the field line, or hundreds of kilometers parallel to the field line (corresponding to a characteristic time scale of few milliseconds during the propagation of the entire wave packet). Using delays of time‐frequency curves obtained on different spacecraft, we have found the same propagation direction as obtained from the simultaneous Poynting flux calculations. The delays roughly correspond to the whistler‐mode group velocity estimated from the cold plasma theory. We have also observed delays corresponding to antiparallel propagation directions for two neighboring chorus wave packets, less than 0.1 s apart.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2002ja009791

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 425

Metadata

Authors
Santolík, O., Gurnett, D. A., Pickett, J. S., Parrot, M., & Cornilleau‐Wehrlin, N.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Published
2003-07
Volume
108
Issue
A7
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043871383
Cited by
425
References
8
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatio‐temporal structure of storm‐time chorus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2002ja009791
The paper
Santolík, O., Gurnett, D. A., Pickett, J. S., Parrot, M., & Cornilleau‐Wehrlin, N. (2003). Spatio‐temporal structure of storm‐time chorus. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002ja009791

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.