Descriptions of the Polarization States of Vector Processes: Applications to ULF Magnetic Fields
Open accessAbstract
In recent years a wide variety of methods has been used to describe the polarization characteristics of ultra low frequency (10−3 to 1 Hz) magnetic fields. This paper gives a more complete outline of some of the descriptions derived from the spectral matrices of n-variate stochastic processes. The matrices are expanded in three different, standard sets of matrices in order to add some simplification to the interpretation of the polarizations. One set is composed of n2 trace-orthogonal, hermitean matrices and leads directly to a generalization of the Stokes parameters and the degree of polarization for n-variate processes. The second set is developed from the dyad expansion, which in particular cases is analogous to the spectral decomposition of the matrix. The third set is composed of n commuting idempotent matrices and proves to be the most useful set when the stochastic process is not strictly polarized. Finally, two examples of digital records of ULF magnetic fields are analysed to illustrate some of the limitations of the methods, and to indicate the biases which are inherent in numerical analyses. The expansions of the spectral matrix which are given in this paper can lead to more simplified and objective descriptions of the polarization states of vector processes. In selecting strictly polarized waves, the degree of polarization P can be determined directly from the Stokes parameters, and then only those waves for which P ≈ 1·0 can be chosen for analysis. The interpretation of the polarization states of these waves is simplified by diagonalizing the real part of S, and if the wave is quasi-monochromatic, the parameters of the polarization ellipse can be computed directly from the elements of the transformed matrix. Conversely, if n = 3 and only the vector perpendicular to the plane of an elliptically polarized wave is required, then this vector can be computed directly from S without first transforming the matrix. Interpretation of polarization states when P is less than 1·0 is more difficult, and in these cases it is probably easiest to expand S in the set of commuting, idempotent matrices. Although the general form of the idempotent expansion can be very complicated, interpretation of the cases n = 2 and n = 3 can be considerably simplified by diagonalizing the real parts of the idempotent matrices. By following this procedure, the information in D1 can always be represented by a two-square matrix. This procedure also gives an indication of whether a1D1+a2D2(n= 3) can be considered to be the matrix of a plane wave. The descriptions of the polarization states which are outlined in this paper should be particularly useful in analysing the frequency-dependent polarization characteristics of irregular waveforms, or waves accompanied by broad band noise. Some examples of ULF magnetic fluctuations for which the descriptions should be very useful are continuous emissions, which may in some cases have structured components (see, e.g. Jacobs 1970), Pi2 micropulsations accompanying geomagnetic substorms, and the irregular Pc5's which occur during the recovery phase of substorms (see, e.g., McPherron et al. 1972). Objective descriptions of the polarization states of these waves will certainly lead to a better understanding of the physical processes which are involved, will allow more direct comparisons of the data with pertinent theories, and will simplify the comparison of data obtained through different experiments.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
P3D and P4D are 3D and 4D expressions of the general n-dimensional formulation of the degree of purity for an nD coherency or density matrix.
“The quantities P 3D and P 4D are 3Dand4Dexpressions of the following general n -dimensional formulation of the degree of purity for an n D coherency or density matrix Omega1 [12,13]:”
From Polarimetric purity and the concept of degree of polarization (2018) · cites this paper as [13]
An equivalent expression for P3D was introduced for the first time by Samson and was also obtained later by Barakat and by Gil as the quadratic average of the relative differences between the eigenvalues of R.
“was introduced for the first time by Samson [13], and was also obtained later by Barakat [14] and by Gil [2] as the quadratic average of the relative differences between the eigenvalues of R”
From Polarimetric purity and the concept of degree of polarization (2018) · cites this paper as [13]
The parameter P3D takes into account all contributions to polarimetric purity: contributions to linear and circular degrees of polarization of R and to the stability of the plane containing its polarization ellipse.
“It is shown that the parameter P 3D proposed formerly by Samson [J. C. Samson, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 34 , 403 (1973)] takes into account, in a proper and objective form, all the contributions to polarimetric purity, namely, the contributions to the linear and circular degrees of polarization of R as well as to the stability of the plane containing its polarization ellipse.”
From Polarimetric purity and the concept of degree of polarization (2018) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Born, M., Wolf, E., Bhatia, A. B., Clemmow, P. C., Gabor, D., Stokes, A. R., Taylor, A. M., Wayman, P. A., & Wilcock, W. L. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108769914 · Cited by 26,405 · see citing works
Spectral Analysis and its Applications.
Freiberger, W. F., Jenkins, G. M., & Watts, D. G. (1969) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286100 · Cited by 4,990 · see citing works
Hannan, E. J. (1970) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316429 · Cited by 2,406 · see citing works
Symmetries of Baryons and Mesons
Gell‐Mann, M. (1962) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.125.1067 · Cited by 2,389 · see citing works
Description of States in Quantum Mechanics by Density Matrix and Operator Techniques
Fano, U. (1957) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.29.74 · Cited by 1,975 · see citing works
Wiener, N. (1930) · Acta Mathematica · doi:10.1007/bf02546511 · Cited by 1,802 · see citing works
Standing Alfvén waves in the magnetosphere
Cummings, W. D., O'Sullivan, R. J., & Coleman, P. J. (1969) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/ja074i003p00778 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Means, J. D. (1972) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/ja077i028p05551 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Jacobs, J. A. (1970) · Physics and chemistry in space · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-86828-3 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Polarization analysis of natural and artificially induced geomagnetic micropulsations
Fowler, R. A., Kotick, B. J., & Elliott, R. D. (1967) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jz072i011p02871 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Fluctuating magnetic fields in the magnetosphere
McPherron, R. L., Russell, C. T., & Coleman, P. J. (1972) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/bf00219165 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Foundations of Linear Algebra.
Westwick, R., Mal′cev, A. I., Brown, T. C., et al. (1968) · American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2315006 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Fluctuating magnetic fields in the magnetosphere
Russell, C. T., McPherron, R. L., & Coleman, P. J. (1972) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/bf00173072 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Kemmer, N. (1943) · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0305004100017874 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Generalized stokes parameters for waves with arbitrary form
Román, P. (1959) · Il Nuovo Cimento · doi:10.1007/bf02724825 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Golan, J. S. (1995) · Kluwer texts in the mathematical sciences · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8502-6 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
An explanation for the apparent polarization of some geomagnetic micropulsations (pearls)
POPE, J. H. (1964) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jz069i003p00399 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
A statistical method for quantitative analysis of geomagnetic giant pulsations
Paulson, K. V., Egeland, A., & Eleman, F. (1965) · Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics · doi:10.1016/0021-9169(65)90028-0 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Jeffreys, H., 1963. Cartesian tensors, University Press, Cambridge.
- Parzen, E., 1969. Multiple time series modeling, in Multivariate Analysis ZZ, ed. P. R. Krishnaiah, Academic Press, New York.
- series analysis, ed. M. Rosenblatt, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Degree of polarization for optical near fields
Setälä, T., Shevchenko, A., Kaivola, M., & Friberg, A. T. (2002) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.66.016615 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Gil, J. J. (2007) · The European Physical Journal Applied Physics · doi:10.1051/epjap:2007153 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Invariant indices of polarimetric purity
San José, I., & Gil, J. J. (2011) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2010.08.077 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Interpretation of the coherency matrix for three-dimensional polarization states
Gil, J. J. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.043858 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Structure of polarimetric purity of three-dimensional polarization states
Gil, J. J., Friberg, A. T., Setälä, T., & San José, I. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.053856 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Gil, J. J., & San José, I. (2010) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2010.04.090 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Polarimetric purity and the concept of degree of polarization
Gil, J. J., Norrman, A., Friberg, A. T., & Setälä, T. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.023838 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Components of purity of a three-dimensional polarization state
Gil, J. J. (2016) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.33.000040 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Petruccelli, J. C., Moore, N. J., & Alonso, M. A. (2010) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2010.04.085 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Samson, J. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Samson, J. C.
- Venue
- Geophysical Journal International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1973-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 403-419
- ISSN
- 0956-540X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-246X
- OpenAlex
- W2163805313
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Geophysical Journal International (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- University of California, San Diego
- National Research Council Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
- Keywords
- polarization state, Stokes parameters, degree of polarization, polarization ellipse, plane waves, frequency-dependent polarization, geomagnetic pulsations, solar wind-magnetosphere coupling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review