Cited by 150Optical Polarization and EllipsometryIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies

Descriptions of the Polarization States of Vector Processes: Applications to ULF Magnetic Fields

Open access
Samson, J. C.·1973·Geophysical Journal International

Abstract

In recent years a wide variety of methods has been used to describe the polarization characteristics of ultra low frequency (10−3 to 1 Hz) magnetic fields. This paper gives a more complete outline of some of the descriptions derived from the spectral matrices of n-variate stochastic processes. The matrices are expanded in three different, standard sets of matrices in order to add some simplification to the interpretation of the polarizations. One set is composed of n2 trace-orthogonal, hermitean matrices and leads directly to a generalization of the Stokes parameters and the degree of polarization for n-variate processes. The second set is developed from the dyad expansion, which in particular cases is analogous to the spectral decomposition of the matrix. The third set is composed of n commuting idempotent matrices and proves to be the most useful set when the stochastic process is not strictly polarized. Finally, two examples of digital records of ULF magnetic fields are analysed to illustrate some of the limitations of the methods, and to indicate the biases which are inherent in numerical analyses. The expansions of the spectral matrix which are given in this paper can lead to more simplified and objective descriptions of the polarization states of vector processes. In selecting strictly polarized waves, the degree of polarization P can be determined directly from the Stokes parameters, and then only those waves for which P ≈ 1·0 can be chosen for analysis. The interpretation of the polarization states of these waves is simplified by diagonalizing the real part of S, and if the wave is quasi-monochromatic, the parameters of the polarization ellipse can be computed directly from the elements of the transformed matrix. Conversely, if n = 3 and only the vector perpendicular to the plane of an elliptically polarized wave is required, then this vector can be computed directly from S without first transforming the matrix. Interpretation of polarization states when P is less than 1·0 is more difficult, and in these cases it is probably easiest to expand S in the set of commuting, idempotent matrices. Although the general form of the idempotent expansion can be very complicated, interpretation of the cases n = 2 and n = 3 can be considerably simplified by diagonalizing the real parts of the idempotent matrices. By following this procedure, the information in D1 can always be represented by a two-square matrix. This procedure also gives an indication of whether a1D1+a2D2(n= 3) can be considered to be the matrix of a plane wave. The descriptions of the polarization states which are outlined in this paper should be particularly useful in analysing the frequency-dependent polarization characteristics of irregular waveforms, or waves accompanied by broad band noise. Some examples of ULF magnetic fluctuations for which the descriptions should be very useful are continuous emissions, which may in some cases have structured components (see, e.g. Jacobs 1970), Pi2 micropulsations accompanying geomagnetic substorms, and the irregular Pc5's which occur during the recovery phase of substorms (see, e.g., McPherron et al. 1972). Objective descriptions of the polarization states of these waves will certainly lead to a better understanding of the physical processes which are involved, will allow more direct comparisons of the data with pertinent theories, and will simplify the comparison of data obtained through different experiments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1973.tb02404.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • P3D and P4D are 3D and 4D expressions of the general n-dimensional formulation of the degree of purity for an nD coherency or density matrix.

    “The quantities P 3D and P 4D are 3Dand4Dexpressions of the following general n -dimensional formulation of the degree of purity for an n D coherency or density matrix Omega1 [12,13]:”
  • An equivalent expression for P3D was introduced for the first time by Samson and was also obtained later by Barakat and by Gil as the quadratic average of the relative differences between the eigenvalues of R.

    “was introduced for the first time by Samson [13], and was also obtained later by Barakat [14] and by Gil [2] as the quadratic average of the relative differences between the eigenvalues of R”
  • The parameter P3D takes into account all contributions to polarimetric purity: contributions to linear and circular degrees of polarization of R and to the stability of the plane containing its polarization ellipse.

    “It is shown that the parameter P 3D proposed formerly by Samson [J. C. Samson, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 34 , 403 (1973)] takes into account, in a proper and objective form, all the contributions to polarimetric purity, namely, the contributions to the linear and circular degrees of polarization of R as well as to the stability of the plane containing its polarization ellipse.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Jeffreys, H., 1963. Cartesian tensors, University Press, Cambridge.
  2. Parzen, E., 1969. Multiple time series modeling, in Multivariate Analysis ZZ, ed. P. R. Krishnaiah, Academic Press, New York.
  3. series analysis, ed. M. Rosenblatt, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samson, J. C.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Samson, J. C.
Venue
Geophysical Journal International
Published
1973-12
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
403-419
ISSN
  • 0956-540X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-246X
OpenAlex
W2163805313
Cited by
150
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Geophysical Journal International (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • University of California, San Diego
  • National Research Council Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Keywords
polarization state, Stokes parameters, degree of polarization, polarization ellipse, plane waves, frequency-dependent polarization, geomagnetic pulsations, solar wind-magnetosphere coupling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review