Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reactive geochemical transport simulation to study mineral trapping for CO2 disposal in deep arenaceous formations

Xu, Tianfu, Apps, John A., Pruess, Karsten·2003·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

A reactive fluid flow and geochemical transport numerical model for evaluating long‐term CO 2 disposal in deep geologic formations has been developed. The numerical model is needed because alteration of the predominant host rock aluminosilicate minerals is very slow and is not amenable to laboratory experiment under ambient deep‐formation conditions. Using this model, we performed numerical simulations for a commonly encountered Gulf Coast sediment under natural and CO 2 injection conditions in order to analyze the impact of CO 2 immobilization through carbonate precipitation. Under conditions considered in our simulations, CO 2 trapping by secondary carbonate minerals such as calcite (CaCO 3), dolomite (CaMg(CO 3)2), siderite (FeCO 3), and dawsonite (NaAlCO 3(OH)2) could occur in the presence of high pressure CO 2. Variations in the precipitation of secondary carbonate minerals strongly depend on rock mineral composition and their kinetic reaction rates. Using the data presented in this paper, the CO 2 mineral‐trapping capability after 10,000 years is comparable to CO 2 dissolution in pore waters (2–5 kg CO 2 per cubic meter of formation). The addition of CO 2 mass as secondary carbonates to the solid matrix decreases porosity. A small porosity decrease can result in a significant decrease in permeability. Despite simplifications in the current model, a comparison between initial model results and field observations for natural diagenesis of Gulf Coast sediments is instructive. Most of the simulated mineral alteration pattern is consistent with the observations. Some inconsistencies are noted, which can help identify issues, limitations, and areas where the conceptual model requires improvement. The numerical simulations described here provide useful insight into potential sequestration processes, and their controlling conditions and parameters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2002jb001979

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 363

Metadata

Authors
Xu, T., Apps, J. A., & Pruess, K.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
2003-02
Volume
108
Issue
B2
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987699551
Cited by
363
References
1
FWCI
13.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reactive geochemical transport simulation to study mineral trapping for CO2 disposal in deep arenaceous formations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2002jb001979
The paper
Xu, T., Apps, J. A., & Pruess, K. (2003). Reactive geochemical transport simulation to study mineral trapping for CO2 disposal in deep arenaceous formations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jb001979

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.