Cited by 277Climate variability and modelsAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Behavior of tropopause height and atmospheric temperature in models, reanalyses, and observations: Decadal changes

Open access

Abstract

We examine changes in tropopause height, a variable that has hitherto been neglected in climate change detection and attribution studies. The pressure of the lapse rate tropopause, p LRT , is diagnosed from reanalyses and from integrations performed with coupled and uncoupled climate models. In the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) reanalysis, global‐mean p LRT decreases by 2.16 hPa/decade over 1979–2000, indicating an increase in the height of the tropopause. The shorter European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis has a global‐mean p LRT trend of −1.13 hPa/decade over 1979–1993. Simulated p LRT trends over the past several decades are consistent with reanalysis results. Superimposed on the overall increase in tropopause height in models and reanalyses are pronounced height decreases following the eruptions of El Chichón and Pinatubo. Interpreting these p LRT results requires knowledge of both T ( z ), the initial atmospheric temperature profile, and Δ T ( z ), the change in this profile in response to external forcing. T ( z ) has a strong latitudinal dependence, as does Δ T ( z ) for forcing by well‐mixed greenhouse gases and stratospheric ozone depletion. These dependencies help explain why overall tropopause height increases in reanalyses and observations are amplified toward the poles. The pronounced increases in tropopause height in the climate change integrations considered here indicate that even AGCMs with coarse vertical resolution can resolve relatively small externally forced changes in tropopause height. The simulated decadal‐scale changes in p LRT are primarily thermally driven and are an integrated measure of the anthropogenically forced warming of the troposphere and cooling of the stratosphere. Our algorithm for estimating p LRT (based on a thermal definition of tropopause height) is sufficiently sensitive to resolve these large‐scale changes in atmospheric thermal structure. Our results indicate that the simulated increase in tropopause height over 1979–1997 is a robust, zero‐order response of the climate system to forcing by well‐mixed greenhouse gases and stratospheric ozone depletion. At the global‐mean level, we find agreement between the simulated decadal‐scale p LRT changes and those estimated from reanalyses. While the agreement between simulated p LRT changes and those in NCEP is partly fortuitous (due to excessive stratospheric cooling in NCEP), it is also driven by real pattern similarities. Our work illustrates that changes in tropopause height may be a useful “fingerprint” of human effects on climate and are deserving of further attention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2002jd002258

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • We use values computed for the ERA-15 dataset (1979-1993), given in Figure 1 of [44]. These will not be quite the same as for ERA5 but are intended only as a rough aid to interpretation.

    “We use values computed for the ERA-15 dataset (1979-1993), given in Figure 1 of [44]. These will not be quite the same as for ERA5 but are intended only as a rough aid to interpretation.”

    From Learning skillful medium-range global weather forecasting (2023) · cites this paper as [44]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Allen M. R., 2002, Quantifying anthropogenic influence on recent near‐surface temperature change, Surv. Geophys.
  2. 10.1029/1999JD900165 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.1058304 · DOI
  4. 10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<1431:COTTDF>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  5. 10.1029/1998JD200046 · DOI
  6. 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<1327:ACOTAC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.1065835 · DOI
  8. 10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<1153:MTTDCA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  9. Dameris M., 1995, Correlation between tropopause height pressure and TOMS data for the EASOE‐winter 1991/1992, Contrib. Atmos. Phys., 68, 227
  10. 10.1007/s003820050182 · DOI
  11. 10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<0029:AOOTRO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  12. 10.1029/2000JD000054 · DOI
  13. 10.1029/97JD01495 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4113 · DOI
  15. 10.1029/2001JD001143 · DOI
  16. 10.1029/2001GL013485 · DOI
  17. 10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<2281:DGGICC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s003820050186 · DOI
  19. 10.1175/1520-0469(1982)039<0412:OTHOTT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  20. 10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<3303:SOTGTP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  21. Houghton J. T., 1996, Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change
  22. Houghton J. T., 2001, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis
  23. 10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  24. 10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0279:IOCCFT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  25. 10.1029/2000GL011925 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/BF00210339 · DOI
  27. 10.1029/1999JD900213 · DOI
  28. Lanzante J. R., 2002, Temporal homogenization of monthly radiosonde temperature data, part II, Trends, sensitivities, and MSU comparison, J. Clim.
  29. 10.1007/PL00007929 · DOI
  30. Mitchell J. F. B., 2001, in Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, 695
  31. 10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<0124:IOSDAT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  32. 10.1175/1520-0485(1993)023<0808:SOTACW>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s003820050246 · DOI
  34. Press W. H., 1986, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing
  35. 10.1038/382616a0 · DOI
  36. 10.1029/1999RG000065 · DOI
  37. 10.1029/2000JD900155 · DOI
  38. 10.1175/1520-0469(1981)038<1928:OTAVIH>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  39. 10.1029/GL011i009p00840 · DOI
  40. 10.1029/JD090iD03p05629 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s003820050140 · DOI
  42. 10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<3004:TCCSWA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  43. 10.1007/BF00223722 · DOI
  44. Santer B. D., 1996, in Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, 407
  45. 10.1038/382039a0 · DOI
  46. 10.1029/1998JD200096 · DOI
  47. 10.1029/2000JD000189 · DOI
  48. 10.1029/2000JD900837 · DOI
  49. 10.1029/95JD03353 · DOI
  50. 10.1126/science.247.4950.1558 · DOI
  51. 10.1029/98JD01929 · DOI
  52. 10.1126/science.290.5499.2133 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1126/science.274.5290.1170 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/21164 · DOI
  55. 10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<0869:GTOTFT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  56. 10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<0017:SIOTHT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  57. 10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<1499:QORITT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  58. 10.1126/science.286.5446.1934 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/350573a0 · DOI
  60. 10.1007/s003820000079 · DOI
  61. 10.1007/s003820050254 · DOI
  62. World Meteorological Organization (WMO), 1957, Meteorology: A three‐dimensional science, Second session of the commission for aerology, WMO Bull., 6, 134

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Santer, B. D., Sausen, R., Wigley, T. M. L., Boyle, J. S., AchutaRao, K., Doutriaux, C., Hansen, J. E., Meehl, G. A., Roeckner, E., Ruedy, R., Schmidt, G., & Taylor, K. E.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
  • Goddard Institute for Space Studies (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (DE)
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2003-01-03
Volume
108
Issue
D1
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098552207
Cited by
277
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
tropopause height, lapse rate tropopause, decadal climate trends, climate change detection and attribution, greenhouse gas forcing, stratospheric ozone depletion, volcanic eruptions, El Chichón, Pinatubo, stratospheric cooling, tropospheric warming, atmospheric temperature profiles, NCEP/NCAR reanalysis, ECMWF reanalysis, atmospheric general circulation model, stratosphere-troposphere coupling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review