Cited by 148Neural Networks and ApplicationsStatistical Methods and ApplicationsClimate variability and models

Nonlinear multivariate and time series analysis by neural network methods

Open access
Hsieh, William W.·2004·Reviews of Geophysics

Abstract

Methods in multivariate statistical analysis are essential for working with large amounts of geophysical data, data from observational arrays, from satellites, or from numerical model output. In classical multivariate statistical analysis, there is a hierarchy of methods, starting with linear regression at the base, followed by principal component analysis (PCA) and finally canonical correlation analysis (CCA). A multivariate time series method, the singular spectrum analysis (SSA), has been a fruitful extension of the PCA technique. The common drawback of these classical methods is that only linear structures can be correctly extracted from the data. Since the late 1980s, neural network methods have become popular for performing nonlinear regression and classification. More recently, neural network methods have been extended to perform nonlinear PCA (NLPCA), nonlinear CCA (NLCCA), and nonlinear SSA (NLSSA). This paper presents a unified view of the NLPCA, NLCCA, and NLSSA techniques and their applications to various data sets of the atmosphere and the ocean (especially for the El Niño‐Southern Oscillation and the stratospheric quasi‐biennial oscillation). These data sets reveal that the linear methods are often too simplistic to describe real‐world systems, with a tendency to scatter a single oscillatory phenomenon into numerous unphysical modes or higher harmonics, which can be largely alleviated in the new nonlinear paradigm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2002rg000112

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsieh, W. W.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Hsieh, William W.
Venue
Reviews of Geophysics
Published
2004-03
Volume
42
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-1209
  • 1944-9208
OpenAlex
W2008078843
Cited by
148
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
13.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reviews of Geophysics (publishedVersion)
  • cIRcle (University of British Columbia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Open Collections
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
nonlinear principal component analysis, nonlinear canonical correlation analysis, nonlinear time series analysis, ENSO, quasi-biennial oscillation, geophysical data, nonlinear oscillations, higher harmonics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review